this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1447 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

69771 readers
3831 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They are desperate to be cool, it's so cringe.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 20 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

I know it feels good to dunk on others and do so with generalities but just the last line, get revenge on the nerds.

Sounds edgy but it’s a slogan that is poor communication. It’s focused on US based tech billionaires and paints them as representatives of nerds. Look at voting data. Tech employees are leftist. People that go to school are more frequently leftist. Rhetoric like this is unintentionally anti-intellectual which promotes conservatism. And in my personal life, there sure seems to be an ocean of nerdy women in the US including in tech like bioengineering and UX and marketing design that is intertwined with today’s techno-facism. I don’t get why these pundits can’t ever stay focused on class warfare and end up resorting to social/racial/gender otherings. Why use language that is so so broad and is a term that most applies to people in your base

Also I’m at a loss at how finance/real estate/insurance/material and manufacturing billionaires have somehow managed to be overshadowed in public perceptions of evil even though they’ve consistently been at it for millenniums and are a cohort of multigenerational families of wealth built on slavery and genocide. They make up venture capital funds that give them ownership across all these companies. Tech CEOs end up owning an ever shrinking portion of a company they did or didn’t found until ownership is mostly a smattering of many large finance companies and family offices. Weirdly fetishistic of proper rich despots rather than these new tech billionaires who still have to go to JP Morgan Chase to facilitate their transactions

Also in the comments co-opting conservative rhetoric like herbivores and I guess carnivores?. That’s weird. Who actually talks like that seriously in real life? My whole life on the left we’ve been so terrible at creating insults but also terms of endearments. It’s weird how bad we are at not only labeling ourselves but also continuing to build terms into positives. Anything eventually becomes an insult towards leftist and conservative terminology is used awkwardly

For the side that places so much emphasis on the power of language, labeling, othering, etc … we’re terrible at it. The side of people with art/literature/communication/whatever degrees. Practically any college level degree is the realm of mostly leftist but in practice people well studied in communication can’t effectively and accurately communicate to people

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Yup. The whole article and “we should bring back bullying” rhetoric (even used ironically) just reeks of someone who doesn’t like “uncool” people and finally found a morally valid excuse to hate on some of them.

Really, not much different from misogynists pointing at random female tiktok influencers and concluding “See? This is why women are dumb and we need sexism”.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is something I observed regarding Trump in his first term, here this guy is allegedly super rich and now leader of the free world, and he still thinks he's a total loser, hence his own inability to tolerate criticism, and obsession on harming enemies and bullying people.

He has to fuck other people's wives and make John Kennedy Jr. eat McDonalds because even being President isn't enough assertion of dominance to make him feel on top.

I have a tender self esteem, myself, and have deep-running neural pathways that will drive me nearly to self harm when I mess something up (e.g. drop my coffee, or burn dinner, or thoroughly lose my wallet). I have these structures of rational self-assessment so that when I calm down I can see I'm actually alright and have some sweet talents, and friends find me useful, and when not even that, at least lovable.

Trump with all his money and power doesn't have that, and people like me can see Trump feels like a total loser propped up by hollow victories, even as POTUS, which is a fucking scary place to be. This is why cabinet meetings are a round-robin ritual of telling Trump how huge he is.

As for the tech bros, they succeeded in their careers which is exactly what we are taught manly men are supposed to do and still feel hollow (which is common when you fixate only on your career). They didn't have that (possibly essential) experience where they collapse into despair as a young person and realize they need personal integrity or spirituality to climb out. (For me it was a moment of rational self-assessment and finding I was not wanting after all; that my depression and self hatred were based on delusions.)

As for Musk, his bio on Behind the Bastards suggests it's really difficult for someone not to emerge from his upbringing without turning into a Disney / Marvel supervillain.

Thiel has his own backstory and obsession, and is perpetually feeling Death (his own mortality) chuffing hyperborean chills on the back of his neck.

So yes, these guys are desperate to cling to power, _because wealth and political transactional power are the only power they've ever known, hence J. D. Vance's obsession on forcing women into natality which is likely to turn into Lebensborn style breeding programs (which inspired Atwood to write A Handmaid's Tale. ) They are terrified of equality because then they'll just be eccentric, antisocial dorks.

(I am an eccentric, antisocial dork, with few things to offer other than listening skills, peer psychology, computer nerding and moral philosophy, and in a world where we're not all overwhelmed with bad news, that is more than enough to find friends, family and crew. But it takes some personal introspection and willingness to practice soft power to learn this.)

If they were able to step away from power, or we took it from them and forced them into peer group support, they'd eventually discover that they don't need to be captains of industry (or James Bond supervillains) to be accepted and loved (and consequently, fed and homed by the community).

And when they've given you their all
Some stagger and fall, after all it's not easy
Banging your heart against some mad bugger's wall

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I agree completely and I'd like to add, when we call Trump a narcissist we should remember that what you described there is what narcissism is. It's self hate manifesting as self aggrandizement.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago

I’ve worked hard to keep these kinds of men out of my personal life, to keep them away from me, out of my goddamn sight... It’s time for us to start getting revenge on the nerds.

And there's the rub. I was there, and we still have the nerd-to-nazi pipeline pumping vast numbers of boys into the alt-right. And to this day, no-one wants to deal with them.

Curiously, Japan is entirely dissatisfied with herbivore men who just want to be left alone in their life with their waifu, but that doesn't produce the next batch of cheap labor and soldiers for industrialists to exploit.

Yes, I'm bitter, and righteously so. Treat our kids better; acknowledge they have sexuality. Teach consent and human intercourse in public school. (We're not going to do these things. We hold great contempt for our fifteen-year olds, whether men or women, and just can't help ourselves.)

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

It's true that we've gone from "oh good now it's cool to be a nerd!" and rapidly progressed to "oh god the really bitter ones are using their success for revenge." What's wild is the image I have of an 80's "reaganaut" (besides a bigot with bad taste) is someone who wants to be out and with people. They want a fuck ton of money to throw around in huge, public, ostentatious ways. These nerds are all obsessed with their fortresses of solitude. Like look even at your brolosopher grifters on the right - they live in sterile, expensive apartments. They never show themselves with people. They are offering this weird cult guru situation of "you don't need people, you need my supplement and course and you will be a king like me." Musk, Zuck, all those fucks (hyuk hyuk hyuk) believe and feed into this shit.

Now they're mainstreaming eugenics and it's getting really bad.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

In the 1980s, being a nerd meant being a target for bullies, and we didn't fare too well. The nerd hierarchy (in which the tech nerds looked down on Trekkies and Furries) was rather brutal, and informs why the furry / otherkin moral panic is mixed in with the trans moral panic.

Eventually, every company needed an MIS and nerds showed they were useful after all. This is not the good ending.

A parallel problem came from young people having libidos that no-one was allowed to acknowledge. We were all incels before the term, and they tried to teach me math when my brain was telling me I needed to rut. Even today, society disregards horny teens, creating a wide pathway to the Alt-Right (Immortan Joe's Warboys) who respect only Alpha Males. Our Christian-centric sex-negative culture fuels the young-men-to-Nazi pipeline.

I don't have a solution for it. The common response to horny-teens-gone-white-supremacists is to say yeah, fuck those guys in total contempt, so they're going to continue to be an available and eager force of militants and voters for any charismatic strongman. They may go Herbivore (like Japanese men) once Generative AI porn gets good.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

I’ll be the first to say millennials have a lot of bullshit and a high opinion of themselves, but something was cracked that made it so most of the white men of our generation aren’t complete total fuckwads who want to stomp marginalized people. If I remember correctly the majority of white male millennials (55%?) broke for Harris. We need to figure out what the fuck was happening at the time, cause I think it’s a lot more than just “Obama.” A ton of us came into the economy at a terrible time with the housing crisis. We were the generation of unpaid interns. But we didn’t go all gestures to musk and trump

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 18 hours ago

Oh god no, this has fuck all to do with being a nerd, the author's overreliance on a film reference not withstanding.

Social netwok had the right of it

for those who missed the reference

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In general, nerds have a history of being treated badly, bullied even, by the people you are talking about.

They arent around people because people harm them more than help them.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I remember the game Bully extended this take. The main character has no beef with the nerds, and helps them, but they still extend their victim complex to him and antagonize him.

Basically, it's a problem with using the generalized word "people" in statements like that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 2 points 18 hours ago

Its not like they made the country antiintellectual, ppl hate when someone knows more than them and refuse to change their views, they just assume they are in the right and double down

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

The saying money can't unlame you still true.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t know if anyone else has noticed this but everything seems to be going down the tubes quite fast.

Yeah like having to accept all cookies to read the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 193 points 1 day ago (14 children)

The thing they all share is that they are deeply unloved. Trump, musk, bezos, zuck, none of them have healthy loving families. They have noons they can genuinely connect with. And they all think by having more money and being more popular will fulfill that human need. But it never does, so they just keep going not realizing the path they chose doesn't end anywhere near what they desire. Money will never buy love and peace.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's a tired stereotype. Powerful people are unloved because they don't need to be loved. They are psychopaths, they have all the love they need, they are bored with the world and have nothing more to want.

People around you are unloved because they have problems.

Also money can buy you a cottage surrounded by nice trees near a river, healthy food, more house animals than you could want, a fast PC, jasmine and lilac bushes outside your window.

I think it can go a long way.

My irritation from this stereotype is because it kinda says the opposite of what it says. It feels like sublimated envy, expressed by saying that you don't envy them. Why talk about their money at all then.

I wouldn't envy anyone's money if that's all the difference between us, unfortunately money buys power and power is used to impose one's will upon me, and that I very much care about.

But your typical young Trotskyists in the Interwebs write whole articles consisting of Marxist vibes (a strong thing, especially in spring, but not enough) and envy to those having more. LOL, someone having more money is not our problem. Our problem is someone attacking us with it.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 17 hours ago

People not accepting that other people got a easier time doing certain things than others is certainly a problem, but too much blaming isn't good as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 116 points 1 day ago (5 children)

And they all think by having more money and being more popular will fulfill that human need.

If that was all it was, then I'd feel sorry for them. No, they're trying to fulfill that need by being Great Men of History with Mighty Plans, but their Mighty Plans are all terrible, because they're horrible people.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will be happy if Zuck is Luigi’d before my death. Also Musk and Bozo.

[–] elrecoal19_1@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I hope you aren't from the US because that's surely gonna put you on a NSA list

[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 5 points 21 hours ago

I have listened to MAGA pray for liberals deaths. I’m just saying it would be funny if they got luigi’d before my own death. I’m not calling for someone to do it. Unlike MAGA.

[–] FragrantGarden@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago

NSA take note, we can Luigi you too. Sit back and let the oppressors perish and it will stop with them.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't worry about the list. We are all on it by now anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Fuck the NSA

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every major politician in the USA has major financial backers with their own agendas that they purchase through superPAC contributions and by funding re-election campaigns. It's been the ruling oligarchy my whole life and I'm middle aged. Pretending it's different or worse now is disingenuous.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

It is worse now, at least the legal money side.

Citizens United removed the limits on the international money as well as the domestic money.

Why is the countey tearing itself apart? Because the foreign money has interest in weakening, stealing, amd profiteering from the USA.

Conversely, the domestic money wants to keep the domestic part from falling completely apart; at least until the real estate, votes, and grant money for the revitalization project are all lined up.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 20 hours ago

Your statement reminds me of entrepreneurship: you've got a dream, a vision, a goal to improve people's lives. What you don't got is enough money to get your dream into the hands of people it will help. So, you go in search of people with money who honestly don't give a damn about your dream, they just want to know how it's going to get them more money, which they already have in abundance but somehow feel the need to continue to grow their hoard. They want to see business plans, with exit strategies. They want to maximize ROI, minimize (monetary) risk, minimize time to market - and those are the criteria your pitch will be evaluated on relative to all the others they receive all the time.

Politicians aren't selling a business plan, they're selling a legislative agenda. They don't have to show ROI, they have to show low-cost electability.

[–] cuban_Pete@lemy.lol 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This movie hasn't aged well, for anyone who hasn't seen it.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 20 hours ago

It was cringe when it released - it's dated cringe now...

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 50 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Imagine if, when Facebook rolled out, people were just like "no thanks, I'm good" and it never took off.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's exactly what happens when a Facebook competitor (possibly an ethical one) rolls out these days. Which is part of the problem. Zuck poisoned the idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

I read the first chapter of Careless People last night and I never thought these people were such large dorks, but here we are.

[–] SaladKing@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one seems to have read Machiavelli’s stuff these days. It explains so much. Also, just history in general will tell you all about today’s happenings.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The Prince was a warning of what could happen. The Drumpf is the result of ignoring the warnings.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

He's such a fucking dork.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 17 hours ago

Awesome discussion.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I just started reading this book about Facebook and I am amazed how little they cared about how much power they had, and how oblivious they were of it.

These are companies that rule the world, but don't know what they want with it, other than for it to generate profit

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›