this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
363 points (97.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

33778 readers
608 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure, playing chess needs intelligence, dedication, and good chess players are smarter than an average person. But it's waaaay exaggerated in movies. I'm a math researcher, and in any movie, my department will be full of chess geniuses. But in reality, only about 10% of them even play chess.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Paul Morphy, chess genius and sometimes described as best in the world in the mid-1800s:

"The ability to play chess is the sign of a gentleman. The ability to play chess well is the sign of a wasted life."

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

Why play chess with Moriarty when you can just bash him in the head with a chessboard?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 31 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I know someone who is pretty good at chess but also thinks vaccines are fake, Musk is a genius, and Ukraine belongs to Russia.

So not all chess players are smart.

I don't think a minority of rightwingers are dumb. I think they're invested in their idea of their team, and any insult to their team is an insult to them. They root for Trump. It's like that one guy you know who owns a lot of Lakers memorabilia despite living in Texas. The media, expectations, their own investment, the threat of being wrong or misguided, "Me? Never!", vastly outweigh any sort of critical thinking. Its straight denial to the core.

But a vast majority? Yeah, dumb as an absorbent trash bag.

[–] expr@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Do you know their rating? Tbh most people's idea of being "pretty good at chess" is actually not very good at all (I don't mean that as an insult, more lack of familiarity with the game).

That's not to say that it's impossible for someone to think those things and be a strong chess player, but it's probably not super common. I've actually ran into a couple people at a local chess club with "interesting" ideas about vaccines and uh... let's just say they were not hard to beat (I think I mated one guy in like 12 moves). And btw, I'm not even a super strong chess player myself (~1134 USCF). But like, they probably would seem really strong to someone that just occasionally plays chess at family gatherings or whatnot. Chess is a game with a low skill floor and very high skill ceiling, so you have a huge range in ability.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

2000 ish, apparently.

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

The only famous douche I know that's very good at chess is Andrew Tate lol

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If you want to beat all of your friends at chess:

learn how to mate in endgames with a few different combinations of pieces.

Castle early and on the same side of your opponent.

Learn to defend scholars mate.

Focus on piece development early on, get you back rank pieces out (bishops knights)

Fight for the center

When attacking a square, just count how many other pieces are attacking and defending that square and see if you have more than your opponent, this is a great way to quickly analyze an attacks value.

Trade when you have a piece advantage, this is like taking a math question and simplyifing the terms. It greatly simplifies the game and brings it in to the the end game with an advantage.

Learn any one opening system just a few branches that can consistently bring you into tactics (static analysis of the board state) even or with a slight advantage.

These tips can be accomplished in a week and will dominate anyone who 'just knows the rules'

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Got it. To beat my friends at chess i just need to learn to play chess.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Funny, but really, those things are marginally more effort than learning the rules and are a far cry from the level of effort it takes to actually be considered broadly 'good' at chess.

Learning one opening system can be done in about an hour and most of the tactics advice is just things to think about as you play.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 38 points 6 days ago

I also think it’s a generational thing.

Back then, since chess was associated with intelligence, a lot of academic types tried to play it and get good at it.

I would say once we had computers, there was another much more practical thing you could get good at.

But seriously, chess sets used to be part of the house decor.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

[odd topic?]

This is from an essay about writers. The author said that you see a lot of architects in movies because it's a fast and easy way to convey that someone is 'artistic' and a bit of a dreamer. It doesn't matter that real life architects are much more about engineering that artistry; it works for a character.

The same thing with chess, it's a fast and easy way to present a 'smart' character.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Architects or advertising executives. Sometimes lead male is one and lead female is the other.

I think it was one of the writers on Cracked that opined it's because those are the only jobs screenwriters partially understand. They're people who pitch ideas to customers, kind of like screenwriters do with scripts. So you get a lot of main characters that have a weirdly large amount of down time, a looming deadline to present an idea for an ad campaign or building to your boss and the three executives your boss is kissing up to. Is it the moment of triumph for our main character, has our main character had a change of heart that he can't run a greenwashing campaign for ExxonMobile anymore because hippy dippy love interest got to him, and now his previous life is going to fall apart and he's going to start over as a shop owner in a small town or something...

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've noticed that a lot of the women in rom-coms are bakers.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then you've got the Hallmark movie they've remade 90,000 times now, where the women are usually some kind of lawyer or executive or something, who travels to a small town likely where she was raised for some contrived reason only to find what she really needs: Some stuffed flannel with designer stubble.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I want that in the next satire. A business card with

Angelina Jolie

Some kind of executive

Or lawyer

on it

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I think my top favorite business card simply said

John Doe

Legitimate Businessman

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

I remember a sign from The Simpsons.

Legitimate Italian Businessmen's Club.

Also from that episode "It's an Italian American Mexican stand-off!"

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

Being skilled at a game has little bearing on your intelligence beyond maybe "above average". Intelligence is often best reflected in learning speed.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 7 points 6 days ago

Chess takes lots of time to get very good. Any actual scientist, professor or engineer doesn't have the time.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Aha. That's because they all play go!

Right?

I'm dumb as rocks at night but I won 3rd in a competition once. My brain does that thing the DVD logo does on your TV when you're not watching anything but I can get a bunch of bullshit into the middle of the board really fast.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

I don't have the patience to learn how to play chess well. I don't think more than one move ahead. My favourite game is Catan.

load more comments
view more: next ›