this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

Xbox

5273 readers
34 users here now

An Xbox community for Lemmy!


UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE

Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe


Rules:


QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:

New to Lemmy?

View the Getting Started Guide

Community Finder


Attributions:

Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg

Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Microsoft is promoting Matt Booty to president of game content and studios, including the new responsibility of ZeniMax, and Sarah Bond to Xbox president, overseeing all Xbox platform and hardware work.

The Xbox changes mean Booty will now lead an expanded organization inside Microsoft Gaming that now includes ZeniMax and Bethesda. Booty’s expanded role should help Microsoft Gaming avoid scenarios like Redfall in the future, with Microsoft clearly focusing on better collaboration between the teams it acquired with the ZeniMax / Bethesda acquisition.

Bond will now take over the hardware and software platforms of Xbox. She will now be responsible for the future of Xbox, both in hardware and software.

These Xbox leadership changes mean there will be more women in gaming leadership roles at Microsoft than men once Bobby Kotick, CEO of Activision Blizzard, departs at the end of 2023.

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Congratulations Lead Booty 😉

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So many of us reading “reorganization” and anticipating several paragraphs of layoffs.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

These Xbox leadership changes mean there will be more women in gaming leadership roles at Microsoft than men once Bobby Kotick, CEO of Activision Blizzard, departs at the end of 2023.

Why does this matter? Why not be proud of people's qualifications instead of what's in their pants?

"They were always sexist before, so let's be equally as sexist now" isn't a good look.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it’s been about what’s in somebody’s pants for centuries and it’s not fair to just let all that accrued momentum keep women out of leadership roles.