this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
124 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

47501 readers
1268 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (17 children)

DUI laws are too strict. It shouldn't be all or nothing at .08 BAC but more severe punishments for more severe inebriation. .08 is pretty low and people who drink regularly can function fine at that level.

People hate this one but... hey, it's my most unpopular opinion.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (3 children)

That's one I used to hold until I went looking for studies on how smaller doses of alcohol impact a person's driving ability. What I found was a linear, dose-dependent response with no real hard cutoffs. Driving is dangerous enough; there's little benefit to making that worse by drinking beforehand.

I might be OK with a reduced penalty at .08, but I'd like to add a slap on the wrist at an even lower level.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 days ago

They used to be more lax, the current rules are more strict because it IS a problem and there are studies showing it to be. Hence the lower BAC limits.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] gazter@aussie.zone 10 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Cycling helmets should not be mandated. If someone is dumb enough to cycle without one, that's on them.

I believe significantly more people would cycle if helmets were not required by law.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 14 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Lemmy is full of bad people

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Contemporarium@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

OMG IM SO SHOCKED A BUNCH OF SUPER POPULAR OPINIONS ON LEMMY!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

Here's mine, and the exact opposite of another "unpopular" opinion here which is upvoted:

Guns.

First of all pandora's box has been opened in the US and can't be closed, there's 600,000,000+ in private hands with no registry to know where/who and trillions of rnds of ammo and everyone who has any of that intends on keeping it. "American gun owners" actually end up being a larger army than most countries militaries, you're just not going to be able to short of finding a way to Infinity rock (or whatever Avengers sucks) them out of existence.

Secondly, good. I'd rather people be able to defend themselves if need be than not, be that against forces foreign or domestic, or against the crackhead down the street with a knife. All the way from the improbable fighting our government, or red dawn style fighting a foreign power on our soil, to the more likely Black Panther style activity and defending against your average deadly threats, or even just hunting for food in the event of a small/large catastrophic event that affects supply chains (if you can't get food at the store because of a natural disaster or something, at least food is walking around, it's just more work). It should never be your first resort, but you shouldn't exclude it from being your last resort.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago

That it's best so sort comments from lowest scores to highest to get the actual unpopular opinions.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago

Sonic The Hedgehog (Sonic '06) is an absolute gem of a game in its original buggy mess form it released in. The bugs and frustration they cause only add onto the charm.

Also, the Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog (not SatAM) cartoon is just as good, if not slightly better, than SatAM due to the absolutely goofy atmosphere. Some of the jokes in Adventures were great. Absolutely loved the joke on Sloww Going where they had Tails writing down whatever Sonic said they needed to rebuild a house for a family of sloths and when Sonic goes to look back at what he wrote, it's nonsense and Tails has to remind Sonic that he's only 4Β½ years old and doesn't know how to write yet.

Saw a video pop up in the incognito mode thing for yt about Tails being a savage and I found a comment that absolutely resonates with why I absolutely LOVE that version of Tails as well and why he's the best version of tails ever. They were saying how his personality really makes him feel like a little kid without a filter. Absolutely the best Tails ever, so I 100% agree with that comment.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 days ago (4 children)

On toilets with two flush buttons for different flow rates, if there is a larger button and a smaller button (with no other singe), the larger button should correspond to the lower flow rate. Odds are more people are flushing for pee, and don't need the extra flow, and the more common action should be represented by a larger button. For people who are unsure, lazy, or not looking, they're probably pressing the larger button just for pee, and wasting water if that were to correspond to more water usage, which is wasteful.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What are the "unpopular opinion" rules on Lemmy?

My original understanding from outside Lemmy is you should upvote the truly interesting unpopular opinions for visibility.

For example:

  • "I think potato chips are gross" - that is an unpopular opinion and I am truly interested in why you would say that...upvote.
  • "Elon Musk makes some good points" - not interesting at all and probably political bullshit trolling...no upvote and a downvote if enabled.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (13 children)

Linux will never come close to replacing Windows.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 days ago
[–] AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago

I'm sure people didn't think Internet Explorer would be replaced either.

But if your product is dog shit log enough, people will move

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί