this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
495 points (94.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

11600 readers
738 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toxla@lemm.ee 6 points 57 minutes ago

Title bait. He said that about entrepreneurship and starting a business, which I can understand as it is very unlikely that you work as an "standard" employee.

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 22 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I am not committed to winning. That's a good thing. I'm committed to living a decent life.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 1 hour ago

Some might say that is winning.

[–] AvailableFill74@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

“Reid Hoffman has a reality check for entrepreneurs: if you’re serious about starting a company, you should say goodbye to binge-watching your favorite Netflix show after dinner or sleeping in on the weekends—you need to be on the work grind all hours of the day.”

You’re clearly not committed to reading articles either. “It’s a headline, it must be about me. Let me make sure I share my opinion without reading the article!”

Opinions based on false perceptions when the truth is 20seconds of discovery away, is just willful and lazy ignorance. Thats not just a red flag, thats also red hat behavior. You can do better than that if you want to.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Not committed to him winning. Fuck that shit.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Winning what? There are different prizes and different lottery ticket prices.

What really tells you are not committed to winning is listening to someone's talk on that.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk -1 points 1 hour ago

Read the article maybe.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 1 hour ago

I would like to see an email from him with a bullet point list of five things he did this week.

[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I guess that would make sense to someone with narcissistic or psychopathic personality organization. "All benefits must accrue to me."

[–] lb_o@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Exactly, I am happy normal people stop following this trend en masse. We just need normal lives, we're not aiming to be the richest or the best of the best. It's unhealthy and not cozy at all.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 46 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The worst people on Earth are the ones who are constantly obsessing about "winning" every situation, so that makes perfect sense to me.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Legit, I think this is why board games are a great activity when getting to know new people. Most people don't want to play with someone ultra competitive, who'll either gloat when they win, or flip the board when they lose. If someone's willing to behave that way over a game, imagine how they'd be over something that's actually important.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

What about someone who is ultra competitive but also has good sportsmanship?

As long as they can identifying that "we win" is the same as "I win," that's fine. I'd invite them to join us for cooperative games.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Those seek real games, and real games are too hard and elusive to describe in rules.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 41 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Achieving a healthy work-life-balance IS winning. That's what the mindless drones don't get.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

counter argument: that makes the company lose, whereas the grindset makes the company win.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"The company" i.e. somebody else's money.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

its a matter of perspective, to the company having people devoted to it is good, to the employee it's bad.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

If I'm devoted to winning, that means I want to win myself. If I don't profit from the company's success outside of being allowed to keep my job, increasing the company's bottom line isn't a "win" for me. That's not a matter of perspective.

[–] Thegods14@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Maybe companies shouldn't be allowed a perspective unless they're worker owned. Case closed! --oh wait, the profiteers need slaves for their yachts.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

that sounds like a good way to get independent contractors to be used by more companies.

[–] Thegods14@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Labor regulation? Never heardofer

[–] leverage@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Wow what a mind blowing revelation dude you must be so smart

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I worked at LNKD through a good part of its rampup. Jeff Weiner made Linkedin what it was. Reid Hoffman was mostly useless and came along for the ride. His "masters of scale" podcast series was a bit of a joke too, he never had anything to do with anything technical or at scale. He is just stealing credit from his betters.

[–] PurpleGameBoy@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Classic famous ceo Behavior, same with Jobs / Wozniak.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Every "famous leader" ; if you want to know a good company, look at ones which didn't have famous leaders or did have leaders notorious for not being famous. DEC, Sun. IBM, after all, though not as cool.

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Explains the insanity you see in LinkedIn posts and comments.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm worried that LinkedIn has gotten worse. If it's not an update about a new job or a work anniversary, it's some influencer-type grind-cult post or a "how to do X with specifically our product" kind of advertiser seminar clip (and I don't need more ansible in my life, thanks).

I'm not sure it wasn't ever much better, but I remember otherwise.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm fine with boring influencer crap. I just hope it doesn't become as bad of a right-wing cesspool as Twitter.

LinkedIn is useful for actually finding jobs because I enter my resume ONCE. I hope they don't throw that away.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 hours ago

Yeah well I don’t believe life is a race, and even if it is it’s rigged so who fucking cares?

[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 4 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Well. I don’t usually listen to the opinions of fat fucks. Because they can’t even manage their own lives. As a technically obese man myself. I power lift and have never had a healthy bmi technically. We should be ignored because we suck at our own health.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Amen brother

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

I'm only committed to winning in that way if winning means that I am getting a cut of the company profits.

I'm at my salary will reflect the profitability and growth of the company.

Otherwise I'm just another wage slave that you're trying to abuse, and take away my work is rights

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Weird. I feel like I’m winning when I’m on a long vacation doing something adventurous and I feel like I’m fucking losing when I’m staring at a computer screen in an office.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

For real I love it when I'm not at work having fun and living life even if it's just boring and I'm at home just working on some house projects and riding my bike

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 23 points 12 hours ago

This man is a sociopath. He shouldn't be running a major corporation. He should be living in a rubber room.

[–] Jimius@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 hours ago

Working hard and long hours at the detriment of other things can be a good idea. If you have equity, a stake in the thing you're doing. You could print money. But if you're an employee, there's no such incentive.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
A STRANGE GAME

THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO PLAY
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 2 points 6 hours ago

How about a nice game of chess?

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Translation: You're not someone we can overwork so easily.

[–] nectar45@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 hours ago

Yeah ...dont fall for this shit

He absolutely has free time and a work and life balance he just wants to take away YOUR life and exploit you

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Yeah Okay Grant Cardone..

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Winning by whose definition?

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

His line going up.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 42 points 20 hours ago

Winning what? Profit for other people?

load more comments
view more: next ›