Well now it will say that Arve Hjalmar Holmen is a twit who doesn't understand how ChatGPT works and what to expect from it
Arve Hjalmar Holmen
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Well now it will say that Arve Hjalmar Holmen is a twit who doesn't understand how ChatGPT works and what to expect from it
Arve Hjalmar Holmen
When asking ChatGPT about my name, it provided the following:
"...it seems like you may be referring to a private person rather than a widely known public figure. If that's the case, I wouldn't have any specific public information on him unless he has gained some public recognition for a particular achievement."
It shouldn't be used for looking up people that aren't celebrities or at least known for something.
“…it seems like you may be referring to a private person rather than a widely known public figure. If that’s the case, I wouldn’t have any specific public information on him unless he has gained some public recognition for a particular achievement.”
If you didn't specifically search for "Mr. ", that would be quite the sexist attitude to assume that person is a "him" ;)
PS: please don't use LLMs, they produce nothing of value and contribute to idiots being deceived.
The problem with that is that a guy who murdered his three kids is known for something.
At the most generous, maybe the professor in the article shares a name with the killer. Articles will include enough information to clear the professor (like maybe the killer has been in jail for a decade ). A LLM will weave together real information about the professor with the "fact" that he killed his kids.
ChatGPT shouldn't be used to find any real information, period.