this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
480 points (99.6% liked)

PC Gaming

9752 readers
367 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Calling it now, EA is going to do it anyway if they haven't already, and tell them all to go pound sand.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

We trained it our own games that we own

I can almost guarantee it

load more comments (3 replies)

Good for them

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I think it is wrong, but this is inevitable.

The next time they hire actors they will just require them to train the AI as well. Voice actors will in a huge part die out. There will be some, but far less. Even A-list celebrities will in the future have to give the companies their likeness and their voice. So that companies can provide dubbing for other languages, make toys etc.

Not the A-list celebrities we have now necessarily, but the coming generations. I can't see a situation in which everyone have a united front and won't take the money

Edit: I realized this is a bit defeatist. A solution would be unions, I should have mentioned that

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›