this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
482 points (96.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

37462 readers
1365 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm a tech interested guy. I've touched SQL once or twice, but wasn't able to really make sense of it. That combined with not having a practical use leaves SQL as largely a black box in my mind (though I am somewhat familiar with technical concepts in databasing).

With that, I keep seeing [pic related] as proof that Elon Musk doesn't understand SQL.

Can someone give me a technical explanation for how one would come to that conclusion? I'd love if you could pass technical documentation for that.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] valtia@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

There can be duplicate SSNs due to name changes of an individual, that's the easiest answer. In general, it's common to just add a new record in cases where a person's information changes so you can retain the old record(s) and thus have a history for a person (look up Slowly Changing Dimensions (SCD)). That's how the SSA is able to figure out if a person changed their gender, they just look up that information using the same SSN and see if the gender in the new application is different from the old data.

Another accusation Elon made was that payments are going to people missing SSNs. The best explanation I have for that is that various state departments have their own on-premise databases and their own structure and design that do not necessarily mirror the federal master database. There are likely some databases where the SSN field is setup to accept strings only, since in real life, your SSN on your card actually has dashes, those dashes make the number into a string. If the SSN is stored as a string in a state database, then when it's brought over to the federal database (assuming the federal db is using a number field instead of text), there can be some data loss, resulting in a NULL.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How come republicans keep saying that doggy is going to expose all the fraud in the government but yet the biggest fraud with 37 felonies is president? What the actual fuck to these people think?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He is saying the US government doesn't use structured databases.

At least 90% of all databases have a structure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think a lot of comments here miss the mark, it's not really just about stating the gov does not use SQL or speculation regarding keys.

Deduplication is generally part of a compression strategy and has nothing to do with SQL. If we're being generous he may have been talking about normalization, but no one I have ever met has confused the two terms (they are distinctly different from an engineering perspective).

There are degrees of normalization too, so it may make total sense to normalize 3NF (third normal form) rather than say 6NF depending on the data.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everything they don't understand (which is nearly everything) is either God or fraud. Do with that information what you will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spark947@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's an insanely idiotic thing to say. Federal government IT is myriad, and done at a per agency level. Any relational database system, which the federal government uses plenty of, uses SQL in one way or another. Elon doesn't know what he is talking about at all, and is being an ultimate idiot about this. Even in the context of mainframe projects thatif we are giving elong the benefit of doubt about referring to, most COBOL shoprbibknow have adapted to addressing internal data records using an SQL interface, although obviously in that legacy world it is insanely fractured and arcane.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

If he doesn't think the government uses sql after having his goons break into multiple government servers he is an idiot.

If he is lying to cover his ass for fucking up so many things (the more likely explanation) then saying "he never used sql" is basically a dig at how technically inept he really is despite bragging about being a tech bro.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The ignorance of Elon is truly concerning, but somehow the worst part to me is Elon calling someone a retard for pointing that out.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Ableist, racist white supremacist doing their ableist-racist-white-supremacist thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CodeHead@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The US government pays lots of money to Oracle to use their database. And it's not for BerkleyDB either. (Poor sleepy cat). Oracle provides them support for their relational databases... and those databases use... SQL.

Now if Musk tries to end the Oracle contracts, then Oracle's lawyers will go after his lawyers and I'm a gonna get me some popcorn. (But we all know that won't happen in any timeline... Elon gotta keep Larry happy.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If SSNs are used as a primary key (a unique identifier for a row of data) then they'd have to be duplicated to be able to merge data together.

However, even if they aren't using ssn as an identifier as it's sensitive information. It's not uncommon to repeat data either for speed/performance sake, simplicity in table design, it's in a lookup table, or you have disconnected tables.

Having a value repeated doesn't tell you anything about fraud risk, efficency, or really anything. Using it as the primary piece of evidence for a claim isn't a strong arguement.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It's more than just SQL. Social Security Numbers can be re-used over time. It is not a unique identifier by itself.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Garlicsquash@lemmings.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Having never seen the database schema myself, my read is that the SSN is used as a primary key in one table, and many other tables likely use that as a foreign key. He probably doesn't understand that foreign keys are used as links and should not be de-duplicated, as that breaks the key relationship in a relational database. As others have mentioned, even in the main table there are probably reused or updated SSNs that would then be multiple rows that have timestamps and/or Boolean flags for current/expired.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turnitoffandonagain@infosec.pub 14 points 1 week ago

I'm still learning SQL, so if I'm out of line someone please correct me, but, the gist of it, is that SQL (Structured Query Language) is a language used in pretty much all relational databases, which with something like the Social Security database is almost guaranteed. Having duplicates of information in a relational database is not a sign of fraud, or anything shady going on.

When you're born, your name, along with your SSN and any other relevant info is put into the database, later in life, say you change your name, the original name, along with your SSN will stay there, and a new line in the database would be added with your new name, along with your SSN again (a duplicate) that way the database has a reference point between old and new name, and keeps all your information lined up between the two.

If you were to get rid of all of that duplicate information, anyone who's ever had a name change, been married, etc. It will cause chaos in the database, with hundreds of millions of entries that now have no relation to anything, and are now just basically dead ends.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Dedup is about saving storage and has literally nothing to do with primary keys.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

To me I'm not really sure what his reply even means. I think it's some attempt at a joke (because of course the government uses SQL), but I figure the joke can be broken down into two potential jokes that fail for different, embarrassing reasons:

Interpretation 1: The government is so advanced it doesn't use SQL - This interpretation is unlikely given that Elon is trying to portray the government as in need of reform. But it would make more sense if coming from a NoSQL type who thinks SQL needs to be removed from everywhere. NoSQL Guy is someone many software devs are familiar with who takes the sometimes-good idea of avoiding SQL and takes it way too far. Elon being NoSQL Guy would be dumb, but not as dumb as the more likely interpretation #2.

Interpretation 2: The government is so backward it doesn't use SQL - I think this is the more likely interpretation as it would be consistent with Elon's ideology, but it really falls flat because SQL is far from being cutting-edge. There has kind of been a trend of moving away from SQL (with considerable controversy) over the last 10 years or so and it's really surprising that Elon seems completely unaware of that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Rows in a SQL table have a primary key which works as the unique identifier for that row. The primary key can be as simple as an incrementing number.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TransSynthesist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

139 comments and no one addresses his use of a slur.

[–] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago

Because that's really just to be expected at this point, and what his audience would want..

Better to focus on constantly poking at him for being dumb, which he and his fans hate, rather than give them what they want, ie being upset at their hateful language

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turtle@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I saw a comment about this in the last couple of days that was really interesting and educational. Unfortunately I can't seem to find it again to link it, but the gist of it was that there would be two things wrong with using SSNs as primary keys in a SQL database:

  • You should not use externally generated data as primary keys
  • You should not use personally identifying data as primary keys

Using SSNs as keys would violate both.

I went looking for best practices regarding SQL primary keys and found this really interesting post and discussion on Stack Overflow:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/337503/whats-the-best-practice-for-primary-keys-in-tables

My first thought was that people's SSNs can and do change, and sometimes (rarely?) people may have more than one SSN. Like someone mentions in that link, human error would be another reason why you would not want to use external data and particularly SSNs as primary keys.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Frankly the whole exchange sounds like Hollywood tech jargon.vaguely relevant words used in a not quite sensible way....

[–] sneaky@r.nf 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Might seem like a stupid question, but I'm in nostupidquestions sooo... Did Elon really do this tweet with the word "retard" in it? Obviously am on Lemmy so don't use Twitter.

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, just another example of what a trash human being he is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Clearly the solution is to just use a big Excel spreadsheet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Musk is the walking Dunning-Krueger, he is too stupid to realize how terrible he sounds.

[–] jerryh100@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That dipshit does not even know how his dear friend at Oracle made tons of money in the past decades.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›