this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
591 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60663 readers
4025 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ETA: Paywall bypass link: https://archive.is/vyU15

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 267 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Amazing how much the US judiciary branch seems to hate the plebs.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 100 points 2 weeks ago (51 children)

Republicans have spent the last 40 years purchasing the entire system, obviously it works for them. They're the ones that paid for it.

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 94 points 2 weeks ago

Note that it piggybacks on the SCROTUS decision earlier about preventing government from protecting anything from industry.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

at least we got actual consumer protection under biden’s FTC’s lawsuits and stuff…

edit: FTC, not FCC

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 31 points 2 weeks ago

They will be promptly rolled back under President Musk

We are losing big time with each successive administration since Congress will never legislate in favour of the working class.

Relying on regulatory agencies for customer protection just creates endless opportunity for corpos to challenge anything favourable to the peasants.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 239 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

[–] Juigi@lemm.ee 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago

It's by design: the rich know how easily "representatives" can be bought.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

It's currently not fill with people who want to help "prople". It currently is setup to help corporate America only at this point. At the expense of your rights.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

this is a direct consequence of the Supreme Court overturning the Chevron deference back in June. the appeals court has to apply the law. so you know who to blame.

expect more cases like this in coming years...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

More specifically: gop.gov

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 151 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

If the FCC can't regulate anything I guess I'll just run a high power jammer and block all cell signal in the area.

[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 38 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Wait! You will get in trouble for that. Instead you need to have an LLC that does that for Profit somehow. Then all is forgiven!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah but technically it's still illegal to disrupt emergency services and also leaves you liable to lawsuits.

But yeah, the FCC in particular can't stop you from doing that.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ahh, but you can subscribe to my private emergency services on my own frequencies which aren't blocked, then nobody can block mine because they are the only available emergency service frequency.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 142 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Their excuse is that telecom services aren’t actually providing telecom services, but information services.

If that doesn’t make sense to you, it’s because you aren’t brain-damaged.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Courted reclassified the services to remove FCC ability to regulate telecos?

Talk about bad faith behavior.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackout@fedia.io 133 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All laws protecting the people's interests are now banned. Don't like it? Well become a billionaire and maybe the supreme Court will care

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

otoh:

Mike Masnick @mmasnick.bsky.social‬

I mean, this is a terrible (if unsurprising) decision, but I'm left wondering how Brendan Carr is going to still try to claim regulatory authority over social media companies...

There is no possible consistency between "ISPs can throttle and block, but edge services cannot..." ‪nilay patel‬ ‪@reckless.bsky.social‬

2h

Sixth Circuit decision striking down net neutrality doesn’t even remotely pass the sniff test lol www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf...

January 2, 2025 at 3:11 PM

https://bsky.app/profile/mmasnick.bsky.social/post/3lerv476tes22

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

comes a time when blue states just need to draw the line and flat out refuse to follow federal laws and judges until federal judges stop being corrupt.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They do it for marijuana laws but won’t treat anything else like that. I don’t understand.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 29 points 2 weeks ago

Money.

Lots of potential tax revenue with cannabis.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago

You say "secede" funny.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 71 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They're going to use this for censorship.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

But they'll call it freedom of speech. Speech someone/corp paid for of course, but Citizens United...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Torproject.org. There's absolutely no way to censor the entire internet, short of entirely disconnecting the internet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 70 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

long-winded sigh

I really ought to set up that community meshnet I keep thinking about setting up...

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I really ought to set up that community meshnet I keep thinking about setting up...

Oh hey, I keep thinking about doing this to and hosting a website like the old days lol, but when I search about it the biggest thing that comes up is like LoRa, but ig it's too slow for hosting internet-like services

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is this really shocking with the incoming sadministration?

That's not a typo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In its opinion, a three-judge panel pointed to a Supreme Court decision in June, known as Loper Bright, that overturned a 1984 legal precedent that gave deference to government agencies on regulations.

“Applying Loper Bright means we can end the F.C.C.’s vacillations,” the court ruled.

"Nyyeaahh nyyeaah nyyeaaaahh ppffthhhhthhth!!" they said.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Like most large changes, it requires an act of Congress. Doing these via the executive leads to weak outcomes like this.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The thing is Congress doesn't have time to deal with technical details. That's why they passed a law authorizing the FCC to make exactly this kind of regulation. The conservative courts throwing everything they don't like under the Major Questions Doctrine is just a way to make sure regulation never happens and Corporations are free to exploit people however they want. The problem here isn't the FCC, it's bad faith judges with the power to stop the entire government.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

tbf it's not hard to convince hayseed chucklefuck trumplings that regulations which exist to protect them are a bad thing because they cost money. we had condo buildings collapsing and people dying WITH regulations.

when bridges start collapsing left and right, they'll blame drag queens and the maga trumpistan patriots will lap it up like hogs at the trough

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 23 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

This is ridiculous how difficult it is to get this law through. Clearly it must be something good. I am 100% behind it.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] spookedintownsville@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

This is really just a game of tech billionaires vs telecom/media billionaries

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

2025 is off to a good start.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›