this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Android

2243 readers
30 users here now

A place to ask your questions and seek help related to your Android device and the Android ecosystem.

Whether you're looking for app recommendations, phone buying advice, or want to explore rooting and tutorials, this is the place for you!

Rules
  1. Be descriptive: Help us help you by providing as many details as you can.
  2. Be patient: You're getting free help from Internet strangers, so you may have to wait for an answer.
  3. Be helpful: If someone asks you for more information, tell us what you can. If someone asks you for a screenshot, please provide one!
  4. Be nice: Treat others with respect, even if you don't agree with their advice. Accordingly, you should expect others to be nice to you as well. Report intentionally rude answers.
  5. No piracy: Sharing or discussing pirated content is strictly prohibited. Do not ask others for a paid app or about how to acquire one.
  6. No affiliate/marketing links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.
  7. No URL shorteners: These can hide the true location of the page and lead people to malicious places.
  8. No lockscreen bypasses: Please do not comment, link, or assist with bypassing lock screens or factory reset protection.
  9. No cross-posting: Please take the time to make a proper post instead of cross-posting.
Other Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If the court ended up forcing Google to sell Android, shouldn't we worry that its license as an open source project could be removed and then it become proprietary?

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 27 minutes ago

You should worry about that in any case. The writing has been on the wall for quite some time now.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Any part that is already open source will eternally be open source. Furthermore, there are rules about using open source code in projects that requires them to also be open source.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 30 minutes ago

This is entirely untrue.

Any part that is already open source will eternally be open source.

Only in the state that it is right now. Google could at any point simply stop releasing the source code with no warning and make all further modifications proprietary.

there are rules about using open source code in projects that requires them to also be open source.

That is only true for copyleft licenses. Licenses that are merely "open source" (also called "permissive") such as the Apache License 2.0 which the AOSP is licensed under do not give two hoots about what you do with the code as long as you give appropriate credit.

The only part of Android that has a copyleft license is the Linux kernel (GPLv2) and I wouldn't really consider it part of the AOSP in practice.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

i think it would probably go the other way. google has closed down so much of the android core system that they would probably respond to the court by opening those parts back up.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

Google is only going to "respond" by doing things it's explicitly ordered to comply with and of course extremely reluctantly; only doing the bare minimum that could be seen as complying.

They sure as hell aren't going to open up the google surveillance services unless explicitly and specifically forced to do so by a court.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 9 minutes ago

yeah but if they're forced to part with them they may believe it better for their market position to strip all the secret stuff out and just disown the rest.