this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
21 points (67.8% liked)

Socialism

5249 readers
171 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I believe in socialism, but I feel Stalin shouldn't be idolised due to things like the Gulag.

I would like more people to become socialist, but I feel not condemning Stalin doesn't help the cause.

I've tried to have a constructieve conversation about this, but I basically get angry comments calling me stupid for believing he did atrocious things.

That's not how you win someone over.

I struggle to believe the Gulag etc. Never happened, and if it happened I firmly believe Stalin should be condemned.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

he was s power hungry megalomaniac that felt no shame in killing anyone who crossed him

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

When you get your politics from Marvel movies

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

From my limited understanding Stalin tried to change things too fast. A comparison that would piss everyone off is like Elon Musk going all-in on robotics in an underdeveloped country.

In the long term Stalins policies paid off, but a lot of people starved because as it turns out putting all your points in technology means you don't have farms.

Gulagging bourgeoisie also isn't bad per se. But Stalin definitely sacraficed innocent people in the crossfire.

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He killed loyal communists, many falsely accused of treason, and became the poster boy of the Red Scare, providing anti-communists with propaganda to equate socialism with totalitarianism. His oppressive policies, human rights abuses, and betrayal of socialist principles alienated global leftist movements and set back the progress of socialism by decades.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Not a great socialist

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He is an ambiguous person. He certainly did a lot of good things, but there were mistakes and even from our point of view, quite cruel decisions. It is difficult to assess why he made certain decisions. There is a lot of unconfirmed information and ambiguous accusations around him, although, of course, there are bad decisions, maybe we don't know all the information, or maybe he was wrong. It was a difficult time back then. According to some reports, at the end of his life, even Lenin treated him ambiguously and was afraid of the concentration of power in one hand and even wrote a letter to the congress, but some doubt this, so it may not be true. To truly understand this, you need to be a historian and read a lot of original documents by yourself. But I don't think that we should consider him only a complete villain, as he is often exposed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›