Technology

58970 readers

3750 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

UK will have removed China’s Hikvision surveillance cameras from sensitive sites by April 2025 as further risks through connected cars, EVs are addressed, report says (www.eurasiantimes.com)

submitted 10 hours ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4231811

The UK Government has made substantial progress in removing China’s Hikvision surveillance cameras from sensitive sites, with over 50% of these devices already replaced, according to a report by the UK Defense Journal.

Efforts are ongoing to ensure full removal by April 2025 amid growing concerns about the security risks posed by Chinese-made technology in government buildings, the report by the UK Defense Journal said.

[...]

However, the security concerns extend beyond surveillance equipment. Lord Coaker’s letter also addressed potential risks posed by electric and connected vehicles, particularly those manufactured in China.

He clarified that while the focus has often been on Chinese-made technology, the security risks apply to specific on-board systems found in a variety of vehicles, not solely Chinese or electric models.

“The potential national security risks apply to specific on-board systems, and therefore, these risks are not exclusive to Chinese-made vehicles or electric vehicles,” on lawmaker said.

[...]

[Edit title for clarity.]

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 hour ago

only home made tech surveillance allowed

[–] br3d@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Any vaguely recent car is constantly reporting its location back to its manufacturer.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

And if you disable it then your car goes to limp mode.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

hurr de durr the ccp is the same as every other car manufacturer you see, i'm helping

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Chinese manufacturers makes modern cars with modern functionality.
The CCP doesn't make cars.
UK has data localization laws.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The CCP does have absolute control over the Chinese manufacturers though. Any a data available to the manufacturers has to be readily available to the government. It's really weird when external companies want to do business in China they need to have a partner company in China that handles all of their data inside the country to cover the government regulations. They really don't go halfway on that firewall of China thing.

[–] LunarVoyager@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

As opposed to the UK's nanny state surveillance system, which is totally fine and normal. And the French Olympics trojan horse.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is happening everywhere in the NATO sphere, not just the UK. I'm a security technician in the US. I've been ripping out Hikvision cams for the last five years. It makes complete sense that a government does not want to watch over its facilities with cameras that another government can potentially access.

Private businesses and individuals that don't interact or contract with their government are still fully allowed to install Hikvision products if they wish. My own house has nine Hikvision cams I got for free from this whole debacle, because I don't give a shit about China.

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

That's very interesting, are the security concerns warranted or just a "better safe than sorry" overcompensation? I recall when the Trump admin started their war on Huawei (for protectionist purposes), the US government suddenly treated all Huawei infrastructure near military sites as suspect despite okay'ing it during the Obama years.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

yes, as opposed to the ccp, fuck me, you people are either nuts or chinese/russian/iranian, same insanity. easy to spot though.

[–] LunarVoyager@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Did I say anything in favor of Chinese bullshit? No, no I didn't.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, while the electric car subs can't stop tripping over themselves gushing about the "cheap, have you seen how cheap" the chinese ev's are

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 8 hours ago

Ur already been downvoted for being right lol