this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
1049 points (97.4% liked)

memes

10010 readers
3144 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Voting is the #1 cause of unwanted presidencies, too.

It's almost like the game is rigged, I tell ya.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This display assumes a smarter than average Trump voter.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

This is for people who don't support Trump.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 38 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I'd say its the electoral college and gerrymandering with some citizens united tossed in for good measure.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

This assumes a person is going to vote for Kamala, because any other vote besides her or trump is essentially the same as not voting.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

More people in general support Kamala's policies than Trump's. If every eligible voter voted, he'd lose, even considering people voting for third parties.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah it's a funny sign but ultimately useless. People who have lived through the last nearly decade dominated by Trump who still aren't voting are either so disengaged that they just don't see fighting Trump as an existential crisis or (and this is a much smaller group) see the system as so inherently fucked that they're just not partaking in it.

But maybe nobody cares for analysis running a perfectly funny lawn sign.

(Disclaimer: these are just my thoughts on non voters, not my own position. I will be voting, and not for a racist, rapist, fascist)

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 51 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Generally, the more people vote, the more republicans lose. "Get out the vote" is an anti-republican message in effect, which republicans know and it's why they try to stop people from voting.

Instead of, you know, being electable.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The Dems have a similar thing going on. It's not "vote for me because I'm a great option", it is "vote for me or democracy dies!". If I only ever had one choice, then democracy is already dead.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

Democracy died when citizens United was passed. It can be revived though.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Right now, it's more like:

"Here are my qualities, what I believe in (with a whole website page dedicated to my policies), my experience as a prosecutor, and why the other side is just plain not fit for office."

Here is the website mentioned above.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago

Which, again, in a sane world, is really just one choice. This, quite frankly, is the only real bullet in the "both sides are the same" argument.

I'm not saying Harris isn't qualified; she clearly is.

What I'm saying is that the Republicans have had years of making their base into good little soldiers that will vote R simply because they aren't D.

These mouth breathers only see the letter after the name. I can't tell you the number of times that voters came up to me when I was a poll worker and ask me who the "Republicans" were in a local election where the candidates can't have party affiliations.

Why yes, these were often elderly voters. What made you guess that?

[–] 10_0@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

Don't use it? Lose it. Vote.

[–] deltreed@lemmy.world -4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Except, they are all unwanted. Two choices isn’t choice.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

One is none and two is one.

[–] deltreed@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Two leads to one outcome. Nothing changes for the better.

[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Yeah one of the choices is on the ballot with no votes from its party members.