this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
36 points (77.3% liked)

Technology

34780 readers
303 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

These are more because they basically fizzled out or the company they were working with decided to stop working with them rather than just shutting down services that people use unlike Google. Once again seems like a Firefox hit piece similar to others that have been cropping up everywhere

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I remember seeing some of this stuff when it came out and thinking "why are they doing this?" A bunch of it I never heard of, and a handful I wish had seen success (Firefox OS). Not sure how this counts as a hit piece, it didn't seem mean spirited and definitely didn't seem to be misrepresenting anything.

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I'm not saying it's a direct hit piece but it feels like people are being incentivized to write articles that paint Firefox in a negative light. Also I think a lot of these were attempts at making money outside of Google

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

FxOS only targeting low–mid-range phones in developing markets only seemed a bit odd. Basically no one had heard of it & these places largely choose used/old version of premium products to buying budget unless they have to. There was hype in the dev community about getting a B2G device, but there was hardly availability & specs were abysmal for an OS running a non-fast interpreted language like JavaScript. Not only that but the marketing was around openness & developer-friendliness—things average consumers don’t care about (even if they should).

Imagine in a parallel universe where the idea was managed properly & B2G left the phone sphere too—where school kids were required to get a FxBook instead of Chromebooks… 😶

[–] corbin@infosec.pub -3 points 1 month ago

Most of the services Google kills are also because they “fizzled out”. If you scroll through the Killed by Google site, a lot of the stuff listed there were test apps or small-scale experiments that most people never heard about or cared to try, like all the apps under Area 120. There are a few high-profile examples (Reader, Stadia, etc) but they’re definitely not the majority, same as Mozilla.

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They also had a "fire" stick, didn't they? Not to be confused with Amazon's fire stick

Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matchstick_TV

matchstick

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I got one of those Firefox OS phones for work once, very cool idea but the performance just wasn’t good enough to be comfortable.