this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
36 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
260 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

β€œThe underlying problem here is that the RCMP is presuming that a person who is engaged in environmental activism, necessarily, is a higher risk for engaging in criminal behaviour β€” that somehow, that you're voicing dissent, that you pose a risk of criminality,” Jack said, β€œand that that gives the police the authority to be investigating you, following you, collecting information about you.”

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

We don't violate your civil liberties, that's what we pay these guys to do!

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Red chot milli peppers

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One time, many moons ago, when I was a young a naive student: I dared to counter protest a student union led protest that I disagreed with. I was polite, non-distuptive, and some distance away from the group.

I got reported to campus security for irrational behaviour by someone, which then caused them to go digging. I had been writing editorials for the campus newspaper and they were in the newspaper offices trying to dig up dirt (my editor let me know).

I have no idea whether there is such as thing as due process and such when dealing with campus security (they aren't really police), but at the time I felt violated. I was expressing a political opinion in the most democratic way I could, and someone gunned for me in response. I don't blame security for doing their job, I blame whomever maliciously contrived a report to make them act.

That said, this story is clearly written slanted towards the ACAB angle. I think more digging is required by the journalist here. What was the actual perceived threat.

(And yes, ecoterrorism is a thing, so perhaps there were concerns, real or imagined.)

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I understand why you felt violated and I'm sorry that happened to you. I think it's odd you seem to attribute none of the violation to campus security. You describe them as passively compelled to follow up on a complaint about a student's (I'm presuming reasonable) on-campus behaviour by going into the student newspaper office they worked in and reading their work. But they chose to do that. They could have handled things differently, such as talk to you versus snoop like they did or dismiss you as a non-threat