this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
51 points (81.5% liked)

Europe

1459 readers
434 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 101 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Musk claims

That's all you need to know

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Musk sucks.

It is not in his interest though, right?

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is the Deal: "Conform to our laws or GTFO?"

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 months ago

Musk just cannot function in a country with laws that protect the citizens. Just look at his breakdown when trying to go against Sweden and their labor laws.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Probably...

But as Musk is an self-centered idiot he prefers to tell some fairy tale of how they illegally offered all platforms to censor stuff in secret or face the the consequences with him being the only one bravely declining.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago

And look at all the muskrats agreeing with his version of this. Disgraceful.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Eh, release the communication Musk, or I believe shit you say. The EU wants Twitter to follow the laws, so what he calls "censor in secret" is probably just the EU reminding them, that they drop the fee if they start to comply.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

From the article:

Firing back on X, the commissioner denied the existence of a secret deal and said no such bargain had been made with any other platforms.
"The DSA provides X (and any large platform) with the possibility to offer commitments to settle a case," Breton added.
"To be extra clear: it’s YOUR team who asked the Commission to explain the process for settlement and to clarify our concerns".

"We did it in line with established regulatory procedures. Up to you to decide whether to offer commitments or not. That is how rule of law procedures work. See you (in court or not)".

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 33 points 3 months ago

"start moderating your nazi hub or we'll fine you"

[–] AtoMops@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Elon Musk has hit out at the European Commission, claiming it tried to make an "illegal secret deal" with X over compliance with new EU rules to prevent online misinformation.

It comes as the Commission announced on Friday that Musk’s social media platform, formerly known as Twitter, had breached elements of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA).

"The European Commission offered X an illegal secret deal: if we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us," the billionaire tech mogul posted on X.

The DSA, a set of sweeping regulations that holds platforms — including Facebook, YouTube, and others — responsible for protecting European users and removing harmful content and misinformation, entered into effect in February this year.

Musk’s harsh words were in response to an earlier post from Margrethe Vestager, the outgoing Executive Vice President of the European Commission and Commissioner for Competition.

In response to a separate post by European Commissioner for Internal Market Thierry Breton, Musk said: "We look forward to a very public battle in court, so that the people of Europe can know the truth".


The original article contains 536 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The charges against X are the first to be issued under the new law, with infringements carrying hefty fines equivalent to 6 per cent of the platform’s global revenue.

6 % wow. Much hefty. Very wow. Many money. Wow. Will hurt much. So hefty. Wow. Such fine.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The journalist is an idiot. It's turnover, not revenue, and 6% of the global turnover is indeed a hefty fine.

Look at the "Non-compliance decision"