this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
954 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3746 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If the linked article has a paywall, you can access this archived version instead: https://archive.ph/zyhax

The court orders show the government telling Google to provide the names, addresses, telephone numbers and user activity for all Google account users who accessed the YouTube videos between January 1 and January 8, 2023. The government also wanted the IP addresses of non-Google account owners who viewed the videos.

“This is the latest chapter in a disturbing trend where we see government agencies increasingly transforming search warrants into digital dragnets. It’s unconstitutional, it’s terrifying and it’s happening every day,” said Albert Fox-Cahn, executive director at the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project. “No one should fear a knock at the door from police simply because of what the YouTube algorithm serves up. I’m horrified that the courts are allowing this.” He said the orders were “just as chilling” as geofence warrants, where Google has been ordered to provide data on all users in the vicinity of a crime.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ignacio@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is this measure worldwide, or only for United States?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In the first line of the article

Federal investigators have ordered Google to provide information on all viewers of select YouTube videos

Federal, so yeah just the US for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Shape4985@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Another reason to use piped or invidious

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

When you're getting honey dicked by YouTube...

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

they have to ask google for this?

[–] EndHD@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/ut-zGHLAVLI?si=RSV7VqRyrqN0y1Y3

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

I don't know if I should watch this after reading that story...

J/k.

Kind of.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I always thought the basilisk was kind of dumb. Atheists invent God, get scared.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Roko will remember this

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Roko's these nuts

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›