It's not really alleged when they admit in their own interoffice emails that it's happening.
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
181 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
59174 readers
1954 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Permit me to express my dissent, for it is my firm conviction that they have unabashedly declared this to be naught but a cunningly contrived deception.
“Providing young people with a safer, healthier experience online has always been core to our work,” Google said. “In collaboration with youth, mental health and parenting experts, we’ve built services and policies to give young people age-appropriate experiences, and parents robust controls.”
It's ridiculous to design an app specifically to get children addicted, then say it's the role of the parents to prevent children from getting addicted. The parents are literally the obstacle that Google is fighting against. The solution is to pass legislation that will force the apps to become less addictive.
We allow children to buy and use these devices but it's the companies who are at fault.
Like, hey, how about doing your job and making some new legislation?
I understand what you mean but they are also so ubiquitous it's hard as a parent to enforce. I try to delete YouTube from our TV's but it's nearly impossible. And if you tell kids not to eat the cookies, they are going to find a way to eat the cookies.
Yes, but we shouldn't be leaving cookies all over the floor for a toddler.
They should be put up, in a jar.
Yeah, it's way too difficult for parents to handle this. Where I live perhaps roughly 10% of parents even think of this as a problem.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The plaintiffs allege that the tech companies violated several city laws related to public nuisance and gross negligence through the design and marketing of their addictive products.
“Over the past decade, we have seen just how addictive and overwhelming the online world can be, exposing our children to a non-stop stream of harmful content and fueling our national youth mental health crisis,” Adams said in a statement.
“Today, we’re taking bold action on behalf of millions of New Yorkers to hold these companies accountable for their role in this crisis, and we’re building on our work to address this public health hazard.
New York’s lawsuit echoes similar allegations made against Meta, Snap, TikTok and Alphabet in litigation filed in 2022 in the Northern District of California.
Multiple school districts and individuals claim the companies’ products “are defective because they are designed to maximize screen time” and that they have resulted in various emotional and physical harms, including death.”
Social media companies have come under fire from lawmakers who are pushing multiple bills like the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, as part of a broader appeal for regulation.
The original article contains 641 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!