this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
692 points (93.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20453 readers
1907 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (18 children)

because it's so easy ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[โ€“] mojo@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (17 children)

How is it easier then any other distro

[โ€“] techognito@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (15 children)

Compared to say arch, gentoo, lfs. ubuntu is easier to install, but I believe the point you wanted to make is that there are distros that are as easy if not easier to install than ubuntu

edit: I see now that this might have sounded more condescending than I had intended, and for that I'm sorry.

The point I wanted to make was that there are both better and worse installers out there. Which is something I enjoy about linux and the different distros. You have the option to install something easy and just use your computer as you see fit, or you can tinker and learn different ways your computer can be set up.

[โ€“] butre@ani.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

you can't convince me that anyone is actually using lfs in 2023. tinkering with it maybe, and I can see someone doing alfs for specialized shit, but there's no way in hell anyone is actually using it as their regular daily driven os on their personal computer. it just doesn't make sense.

real people outside of the ubuntu space are using debian, fedora, manjaro, maybe something like pop os or mint. there's no barrier to entry, performance difference is negligible if present at all, and you don't have to spend a full day getting it ready

[โ€“] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The only real difference I can think of is that Ubuntu's installer is actually really nice and had the dual boot install option, which I don't think any other distro has.

[โ€“] butre@ani.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

most distros that aren't like slackware/gentoo/arch/etc. install with calamares these days, it handles dual boot configs simply and without issue. even doing like debian netinst, I don't remember it having any trouble

[โ€“] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In terms of ease of use, no. They're capable, but in Ubuntu it's literally as easy as choosing how much space do you want to leave for Windows and Ubuntu, then it handles all the partitioning for you.

[โ€“] butre@ani.social 2 points 10 months ago

it's been years since I bothered with windows I'll admit, but I'm fairly certain calamares handles it all for you too

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)