this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
32 points (88.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

28927 readers
1582 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If the descentralization of social networks continue, we will have to prepare for the eventual rise of the instances wars, where people will start to fight about which instance is better and which one is weird to be in and so on, but that's for the future of us all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This will likely follow a similar pattern to email, since it's starting from a very similar position.

At some point people will begin to assign identities to instances and imagine (rightly or wrongly) that being on an instance says something about a person. People do that with cars, shoes, and yes, even email domains.

From a technical perspective, right now Lemmy is as anonymous as can be — I've yet to see an instance that requires ANY kind of verification. I didn't need to provide an email address, phone number, or any other identifying information to sign up. Didn't even need to solve a captcha. I just choose a name and set a password and BOOM! I was in.

Once upon a time, email worked this way, too. Then came the spammers, scammers, and other bad actors, and this was deemed untenable. Nowadays, any email provider that allows anonymous signup is likely to be blocked by most of the email-using world. You won't be able to use them to sign up for other services, and you might not even have your mail accepted by other providers.

This will definitely become a problem as Lemmy becomes popular, and instance admins will need to crack down, lest they be overrun and defederated by the rest of the world.

I'm not sure what the answer is. This is a problem that has not been adequately solved, IMHO. A few bad apples spoil the bunch. That's been true since long before the Internet.

[–] njtrafficsignshopper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wait - what kind of proof of identity do Gmail, outlook, Yahoo, etc require to make an email address?

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not sure about all of them, but for Google, you can't create a new account without a valid phone number for SMS verification. If you created your account a long time ago then you're kind of grandfathered in and don't need to add a phone. They don't allow known VOIP numbers (including Google Voice) and I think you cannot use the same number for lots of accounts.

This might vary by country. My experience is with the US version of gmail.

[–] njtrafficsignshopper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hm I have made at least 3 gmail addresses and didn't have to do this. And in fact their apps support account switching pretty easily, which seems to indicate that they don't really disapprove of making multiple accounts.

In fact the only thing they asked for was a backup email address in case you get locked out or they need to send security alerts, and that was optional.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. I had to make a new account just a couple weeks ago (for Android testing as part of my job) and there was no option to continue without SMS verification. Couldn't use a landline, couldn't use VOIP, couldn't fall back to email verification or anything else.

One of my coworkers was unable to use their cell phone number because Google said it was already in use. But it let me use the same number I have associated with my personal account, so go figure.

Interesting, could be because it's something you've had to do often enough that they're trying to rate limit you

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)