this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
39 points (93.3% liked)

Canada

9555 readers
784 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

the plight of young people has faded into the background, as the trade war with the U.S. takes centre stage in Canada’s federal election. Meanwhile, political parties have said more about protecting seniors’ retirements than helping young Canadians get a head start.

...

New polling conducted by Nanos Research for The Globe and Mail and CTV News suggests that while the trade war is the top issue for Canadians 55 years and older, the cost of living is the priority for younger Canadians. Only one in 10 Canadians polled under the age of 35 said the trade was their main issue.

Canadians under the age of 35 are also more likely to trust Mr. Poilievre (38 per cent) – who has made the cost of living a central focus of his campaign – than Mr. Carney (26 per cent) to help young people.

The trade war has “taken the oxygen out of the room,” said Mike Moffatt, founding director of the Missing Middle Initiative, a project housed in the University of Ottawa’s Institute for the Environment with the stated goal of reviving Canada’s urban middle class.

“Other than housing, there has been a real absence of any policy to help struggling young people.”

From: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/federal-election/article-federal-election-2025-young-voters-housing-affordability-economy/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Like I’m sorry but these kids were in elementary school when Trudeau got elected and every day since their parents have been paying for less and less of their stuff.

The article interviews people in their 30s, and the poll is of Canadians under 35. I'm not sure about our demographics, but I'd expect many of the respondents have been in the workforce for a few years. They're generally priced out of home ownership and their rent has skyrocketed. Those are the same people who are reporting lower levels of happiness (as per the article), and probably having a harder time with the inflation we've seen since the start of COVID.

Blaming their concerns on "scrolling social media endlessly" doesn't address the problem that they are legitimately having a shit time. I don't think the Conservatives have the answers to these problems, but dismissing them out of hand sucks.

[–] Thepotholeman@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know the article mentions 30 yr olds, I'm almost 30 myself but I'm just talking about people 18-25. They are ALL talking about Pierre as if he's the guy to fix their problems and I believe it really is because they aren't able to simply look at history to show them what happened with shit that Pierre is proposing and how it Infact does not make their lives easier

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's shitty. I haven't looked too closely at the CPC platform, but it doesn't seem great. Their promise to build 2.3 million houses in five years seems unachievable, but I can understand people wanting it to be true.

I'm pretty far from 25 or 30, but I'd really like to see more coverage of what's happening with that demographic.

[–] Thepotholeman@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly both the liberals and conservatives numbers are both high AF and seem impossible to do in five yearsnwothout more immigration and training inbthe trades. They are both offering to do that, but the liberals HAVE a plan, like they are actually producing results and are ready to go with the pre approved homes catalogue that can buy used across the country to build homes faster and cheaper because they are pre-approved.

The conservatives are just offering to.... Cut the taxes involved in building?🤷 Oh and Punish municipalities for some reason? Idk. The conservative argument has just been "we're not Justin" for ten fucking years with zero alternatives or substance. And to see dudes saying they will vote for Pierre even though if Carney was running for the conservatives they would vote for him in droves.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

The conservatives are just offering to.... Cut the taxes

Recognize the theme: the cons only want to cut taxes. They label it something else every time, based on what people may want to hear, but the goal is less taxes for their friends. It's lower tax, MUCH reduced services for the plebes, trickle down bullshit.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

the liberals ... are actually producing results

Housing starts haven't really improved since 2021, and the LPC plan started late 2023, didn't it?

I'm not (generally) seeing a significant increase in housing starts or improvements in affordability (although rent in a few centers has dropped). Maybe once the existing LPC proposals make it a bit further (like the housing catalog you mentioned). But it isn't looking great so far.

[–] Thepotholeman@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

I mean by the housing accelerator program getting teeth and going directly to municipalities instead of through the provinces. That's that the liberals want to do. They announced this approach back in late 2023 or early 2024 I believe, including the catalogue. And then the conservatives MOCKED them for producing one.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm just happy to still be considered young lol.

My circle, most want the Feds to do more with what they can, but largely place blame on provinces & municipalities for housing & rent, Ontario removed rent controls for units built after 2018 when the pcpo formed government as one example. The lower levels of government have a larger impact on your day to day and yet have the lowest engagement, my (ndp) MPP even sent out a "this level of government is responsible for this" magnet with numbers and departments of it to (I think) help address that.

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Rent control is a first mover advantage at best, a paper over what mass immigration has done. It also hurts people living with abusers and limits mobility while defeating political will, not that it had much will to begin with given Liberal polling after 10 years.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago

Rent control helps every year after the first in a new place.

The alternative is far worse.