this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
13 points (78.3% liked)
Asklemmy
47641 readers
847 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can imagine a lot of things. That doesn't make those things real or meaningful.
Well if X has value then 2X probably has double the value. Does that make sense?
From a pure math point of view with some assumptions about X being greater than zero, sure. There is an upper limit to the value of thinking about a thing though and it's somewhere between "thoughtful consideration" and "huffing my own farts in lotus position for 12 hours a day".
"thinking about a thing" isn't how you meditate.
See, your conclusion is based upon a false assumption.
Would you please provide your definition of "meditate"?
Edit: Merriam-Webster entry for reference so I'm not asking you to do all the work here.
Destroying your thesis is sufficient. For now I will simply let your uncertainty fester.
K.