this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
506 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

68305 readers
4370 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org 144 points 1 day ago (19 children)

He certainly running the country into the ground like one of his businesses

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (11 children)

This is actually kind of funny. Because his first term is more or less considered successful in financial circles, (COVID aside). But the entire time he was fighting with aides, bureaucrats, etc... who kept either getting in his way or talking him out of his crazy or stupid ideas. Now he's removed all the safeties and we're getting full Trumpism with all the horrible financial decisions it brings.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 57 points 1 day ago (7 children)

He wasn't successful at anything.

He slashed the corporate income tax and due to an effective amnesty on repatriation many large MNCs brought stashed offshore cash and cut R&D to register massive earnings for his last 2 years.

Ironically, this started to dry up right around Q1 2020... Then COVID drowned out everything.

His response was to just pump $4T to employers with almost no documentation, thank god we didn't see a massive wave in inflation out of that.

[–] NikoWantToGoBowling@lemm.ee 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Okay this post reeks of not understanding basic accounting. Bringing back cash doesn’t affect profits for firms. The earnings were already earned. Having money over seas and bringing it on shore does not increase your profits, it just frees it up for investment (or giving to shareholders).

Also cutting R&D does not change profits in the short term. Any amount of R&D doesn’t change profits in the short term (either less or more). R&D is treated as an asset and depreciates over time (which does affect profits) but that’s clearly not what you’re saying here.

The rest of your post I’m not arguing with but your understanding of accounting and how offshore money works is factually incorrect.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.bea.gov/news/2019/direct-investment-country-and-industry-2018

The TCJA generally eliminated taxes on dividends, or repatriated earnings, to U.S. multinationals from their foreign affiliates. Dividends of $776.5 billion in 2018 exceeded earnings for the year, which led to negative reinvestment of earnings, decreasing the investment position for the first time since 1982. Tables 3 and 4 provide information on the country and industry breakdown of dividends.

By country, nearly half of the dividends in 2018 were repatriated from affiliates in Bermuda ($231.0 billion) and the Netherlands ($138.8 billion). Ireland was the third largest source of dividends, but its value is suppressed due to confidentiality requirements. By industry, U.S. multinationals in chemical manufacturing ($209.1 billion) and computers and electronic products manufacturing ($195.9 billion) repatriated the most in 2018.

[–] NikoWantToGoBowling@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Right and at no point are you saying that earnings/profits were impacted by the tax amnesty and money being brought back on shore.

Your link says that the most predictable thing happened- all that money sitting over seas was given back to its owners (shareholders).

Absolutely none of this affected profits for that year. Mind you, that money was not being used for R&D anyways - it was sitting in bank accounts or bonds waiting for a moment like this to come back and be handed out to shareholders.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

That's literally what I'm saying.

Are you being semantic?

They realized the revenue as dividends, which is exactly what the link says.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)