this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
122 points (95.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12034 readers
265 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't understand. What exactly is the complaint here? That they're over charging or charging at all?

Or is this just bandwagon hate on a common and ancient business practice?

Because there is nothing immoral or unethical about having multiple rental property.

And don't give me this shit about how they're evil for over charging. The middle class holds all the power all we're lacking is organization and education.

[–] commander@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

Because there is nothing immoral or unethical about having multiple rental property.

Wrong. Nobody should have extra houses to "rent out" while hardworking citizens can't afford a single house of their own.

The reason why we don't have enough is because they have too much.

Stop being a useful idiot. It's falling out of fashion.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because there is nothing immoral or unethical about having multiple rental property.

You're charging someone for you doing nothing so they can have a basic need to survive. It's very immoral

If you're gonna try to defend an immoral act with

Or is this just bandwagon hate on a common and ancient business practice?

Then Ill assume you're pro-slavery and move on

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Charging for housing isn't immoral just because it's a necessity. By that logic, grocery stores are immoral for charging for food, and doctors are immoral for charging for healthcare. Property ownership and rental markets exist because providing and maintaining housing costs money. If your argument is that the system should be reformed, fine, let’s talk solutions. But calling all landlords inherently immoral is just lazy thinking.

Also your comment on slavery is offensive which I believe is the only reason you added it which makes you sound even more stupid.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also your comment on slavery is offensive

So you know your argument works perfectly for slavery, can see how it applies and are embarrassed enough being called out on it to be offended, but not to rethink yourself? That response is actually why I included it: easy way to tell you're not to be taken seriously

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, please. Get off your intellectual high horse. Your ability to string coherent words together doesn’t mean you actually know anything. All you’ve done is throw out a false equivalency and some hyperbole. I present arguments, and you respond with pseudo-intellectual gibberish. The people who take you seriously are the same ones who fart into wine glasses, idiots. I’m so tired of you hipster fucks on Lemmy. You talk about things you don’t understand and convince yourselves you’re enlightened. You’re just short-sighted trash wrapped in $100 words and YouTube rhetoric.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago

All you’ve done is throw out a false equivalency and some hyperbole

No, I pointed out that your main argument in your original comment was terrible as it was an equally valid defense for slavery, figuring that if you got butthurt at being called out on it that you weren't worth engaging mentally with, as anyone of any decency would see that and go "oh fuck dude maybe I should rethink at least that part of my stance", it's literally what I said in my comment ffs

you respond with pseudo-intellectual gibberish

My point, non-intellectual as it may be (like basically everything I do), wasn't gibberish to anyone with basic reading comprehension