this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
489 points (93.6% liked)

Asklemmy

44151 readers
2509 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alternatively, if your current phone doesn't have a headphone jack, do you wish it did?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 124 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why wouldn't you prefer a headphone jack in your phone? It is yet another option for headphones that worst case you don't use. The only reason it has been removed is because it saves companies a few cents on the cost to build the product.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They remove it to push people to use bluetooth, on iOS this means you wont disable it permanently and keep Apples tracking network alive. Not that nasty on Android but I suppose the same reasoning

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I should have added, that for companies that sell Bluetooth headphones it also helps drive sales for those devices, particularly that is why Apple did it.

[–] DrQuint@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, Apple even bought Beats and immediately let the brand stagnate literally just so they wouldn't have any competition in the marketing space. That kind of move basically confirms that other moves they did likely had similar rationale.

It's possible that Apple is actually aiming towards their "portless phone" dream, and this death of the jack was just a step. But I'll take it for the "we must employ the closest practice to profiteering as we can in the wireless audio space" aspect it appears to have.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I am curious when they want to buy Bose, as they are pretty much the most common headphones people wear around me

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Eh… I’m not sure it has anything to do with AirTags and the find my network. They weren’t a thing until a couple of years after the 3.5mm jack was removed. It’s probably a benefit now, but I suspect most people don’t bother turning off Bluetooth anyway.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Interesting, I always keep Bluetooth off unless I'm using my BT headphones. Saves battery. I never took privacy into consideration

[–] Rexios@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Disabling things like Bluetooth and Wi-Fi has had a negligible affect on battery life for years

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

For sure, but I don’t think the average non-technical person messes with that at all. Privacy is technically a concern with wifi and Bluetooth on because your phone basically acts as a beacon, but there are some mitigations in place to switch mac addresses and stuff fairly regularly.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

More importantly it removes the expectation to include earbuds with the phone as well as allows them to sell you Bluetooth ones

[–] abir_vandergriff@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Let's be honest though, included earbuds were pretty universally garbage and the world is probably better off without the ewaste.

That said, please bring back the headphone jack.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One positive for me about the included earphones is they are great utility earphones for when I'm mixing/mastering music. They have a pretty flat and even response so it's one of the devices I use to test my music on "regular" sound systems to make sure they sound good on all types of equipment.

[–] abir_vandergriff@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That totally depends on what headphones though. Apple's maybe, I wasn't really too discerning last time I had some of those, but on Android it was a mess. Samsung had decent ones some years, Google's were generally okay at best, and LOADS were just actual trash.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I forgot to mention I was pertaining to the apple wired earphones specifically.

[–] abir_vandergriff@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Color me surprised to hear that then. The few times I had used them, I couldn't get over how uncomfortable they were for my ear (which is why I never used then much)

[–] Alto@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mostly true, yeah. The "AKG" ones that came with my S8 were honestly pretty damn nice though.

[–] cloaker@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

AKG ones were always great. I have a USB C pair from an old Samsung and they're good too.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Yea I had a pair of those that I used for other phones, until I lost the pair.

I tried getting some "oem" ones from amazon but they weren't the same

[–] qupada@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've always been lambasted for this opinion, but I feel the same way about the charging cable and charger.

I do not want yet another 1 metre (if they're even that, most likely 3 foot) USB-C cable that barely reaches from the charger on the floor to the bedside table - and largely precludes actually using the phone while in bed - nor particularly the included charger. So many things need to be plugged in these days that single-output chargers are also basically e-waste.

Of course because some business genius had the idea that making the USB cable 0.9 instead of 1.8m saved them $0.06 per unit shipped, we all got lumped with those useless cables.

Now of course there will always be people for whom it's their first phone (or whatever situation), who do need those accessories. But all that requires is there to be a retail bundle with the now-accessory charger and cable. Preferably that bundle costs the same as the phone with them included does today and you get a token discount for the phone without them, although we all know it would never work that way :(

[–] abir_vandergriff@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I'm in the minority on this myself, but I fully agree. Honestly, I don't even need the discount, tell me I can make a fraction less plastic waste and I'm pretty much there. When I got a new phone a couple years ago, I just put the cable at my desk so I had a spot to plug in misc stuff, but I definitely didn't need it.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is the real reason. The cost savings is negligible. But as soon as Apple got rid of the headphone jack, they introduced the AirPods.

Then Google did it, Samsung did it, and every other phone manufacturer followed suit. They all have their own wireless earbuds.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fairphone did it too, of all the companies. Shows that the margins on these things are pretty big for Fairphone to do such a thing.

[–] hypelightfly@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's why I'm getting a Zenfone to replace my ~6 year old phone now instead of a Fairphone. It even has a far better IP rating than the fairphone despite the "horrible" water intrusion supposedly caused by 3.5mm jacks.

Fairphones lying BS about why they removed the port convinced me to never buy one of their phones, even if I didn't care about it.

[–] qupada@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Sony listened to their customers complaints and brought back the headphone jack for the 2nd generation Xperia 1.

Their phones continue to feature some of the best waterproofing (real world performance, and not just the rating they slap on it) in the entire industry.

That has never been a justifiable argument against the headphone jack, despite being an all-too-frequent one.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

I really doubt this is the primary reason. I think it was multifaceted, but really the people in the business of designing phones were already using Bluetooth exclusively and felt that it was good enough. Some designs probably rushed it as a means to sell more premium headsets (Apple, Samsung), other saw it as removing an unnecessary redundant feature that was more prone to breakage and a waterproofing difficulty (Google). I think it really just came down to the personal preferences of the (affluent) people who were doing the designing, not necessarily a purposeful cash grab. It really was not great since wired headphones were way cheaper than their Bluetooth counterparts. Luckily Bluetooth has gotten much better and less expensive. I think there should be options for both.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's why I buy the $20 straight from the Chinese factory ones, because fuck 'em

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Or they can include $20 wireless earbuds and say "Early preorder bonus earbuds, a $200 value if you ORDER NOW NOW NOW"

[–] Llamajockey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So many times I've forgotten my Bluetooth headphones or they've died and I always find some wired ones but can't use them, or I can even go into a gas station and just buy some for $1.

Also my Sony headphones have an optional aux port to plug in, nice to use when they die because it doesn't need battery, or if I want to plug into another device without having to pair everytime.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That sounds nifty, headphones that let you run BT and port as you choose? I didn't know this existed, will keep in mind!

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 1 points 1 year ago

I had a pair of Sony headphones that could do the same thing!

Sadly, they were bad on both choices, BT's battery didin't last sh*t, and the wired input somehow reduced the volume (like, by a lot).

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just another thing I don’t use that takes up space and can go wrong. Same reason i don’t need it to have a cassette deck or 8-track player.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, cassettes were just designed to go wrong altogether 😆

But while wired headphones are indeed "analog devices" they do not have any mechanical parts moving, so really if you take good care of them they can last a lifetime. (Unlike BT headphones with batteries with approximate estimations of life). 🤒🤕

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I never said anything about the headphones. I was referring to the port, which can get gunked up, damaged by water, or all sorts of other stuff. in my many many years of using Bluetooth headphones of all types, I’ve never had a single thing go wrong— and because I am a responsible adult, I’m capable of recharging my batteries.

The era of annoying snags painfully pulling out wired headphones from my ears is a headache I’m very glad to have left behind long ago.

[–] Erk@cdda.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the point is more that in seeking to satisfy people like you, they've made everyone who likes the more reliable tech SOL.

Personally I love my bt headphones, but I also liked having a wired set for backup in case my battery ran out. If I had a choice between a jack and no jack on an otherwise feature-identical phone I'd choose the jack

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m capable of keeping my batteries charged and haven’t really run into that problem. I also appreciate having my phone be water resistant and having one last thing to go wrong like getting the port get gunked up from stuff in my pocket. 

As far as reliability goes, I suggest you try some better headphones, because I’ve never had a reliability problem either. 

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why wouldn't you prefer a headphone jack in your phone?

I've seen some people literally say that they don't want a phone with a useless hole in it (in fact, it was said right here on Lemmy not long ago), whereas others claim that not having a headphone jack == bigger battery. Some, like Fairphone fanboys in particular, have gone as far as claiming that removing the headphone jack reduces e-waste...

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Some, like Fairphone fanboys in particular, have gone as far as claiming that removing the headphone jack reduces e-waste…

That is a terrible argument for someone to make. There is no way to argue that removing the headphone jack does anything but create more e-waste. First from all the perfectly good wired headphones that are now forced to be replaced, secondly from the fact that Bluetooth headphones all have a shelf life due to the li-ion battery after which they become e-waste. Even with the Fairphone headphones the battery becomes e-waste that wouldn't exist with wired headphones, cables do wear out too, but replacing that part will have a smaller energy footprint to replace than a battery.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] hypelightfly@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

None of those are valid arguments, especially e-waste. It's literally the opposite, fairphone is gaslighting.