this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
100 points (93.9% liked)

Games

17605 readers
409 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Eh. The Internet is too full of useless crap thst costs energy to keep alive. No one needs endless swathes of boring videos. If there are some valuable recordings there, then they can preserve those.

[–] Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I agree in this case but this is what they thought at the dawn of computing, too and we lost a lot of history.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

True but at the dawn of computing we were too naïve. We couldn't imagine people would record everything.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think the point is that you can't know what you don't know. They weren't naive back then, they were ignorant and limited by the technology of the time.

We preserve stuff precisely because we don't know how it might be useful in the future.

We have a name for things we know for sure won't be useful in the future: Trash.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, absolutely, but we also preserve everything because separating the wheat from the chaff is too much work. For example, most people store all the pictures they take because it's easier than selecting the ones we might want later. But we kmow some of them are useless.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

See but that's my point. They are useless as far as we can tell in the present.

Maybe in 2 years we will regret not having mountains of recorded streams when we're training models for AI streamers. And so on and so forth.

load more comments (3 replies)