this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
24 points (85.3% liked)
PC Gaming
8877 readers
370 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
more frames, with higher latency!
The complete opposite of the point of wanting higher framerate!
I wish everybody paid closer attention to input latency with frame generation.
Not at all since they're developing Reflex to be AI boosted.
yeah.... no.
Uh, yeah..
they could use that power to actuall render the game. Not fake it.
So rasterised vector graphics are 'real' to you and DLSS is 'fake'. How very technical of you...
one calculates what the pixel's color should be. That's the actual color that that pixel should be. The real one.
The other one doesn't try to calculate it and makes an educated guess. That by definition is "not rendering the pixel".
It has nothing to do with how realistic it looks. And yes, having written both software raytracers and rasterizers, I am technical about this stuff a bit more than just calling vulkan and having it do its magic. I actually dived in all the way
Both are data computations of a fictional scene... what difference does it make?!
One draws the scene one guesses at it.
one computes the scene, the other literally tries to guess it.
Both are binary computations. Where am I right now, lmao..
how very technical of you!
Yeah, I know.
I’m not sure what you aren’t getting
You can try it on yourself;
2+2=?
(Sqrt37x 9.436e3+16^3)/2=?
Assuming you do both in your head if you want to do the 2nd fast enough you would have to guess
Your argument is “why does it matter? They’re both done in my head”
The more complex the guess the less accurate it becomes
youtube.com/watch?v=_ZSFRWJCUY4
This shows why it matters
And both are mathematical operations... so I'd say it's you who's not getting it.
yes but if you're trying to calculate the mass of a pea, but you execute the computation that calculates the radius of the sun, you get the wrong answer. You can't substitute any mathematical expbession for any other. I know you're trolling at this point, since nobody could possibly be this obtuse. But I felt generous, and felt like feeding you one last time. Because, by your own logic, if you can't execute any possible calculation, then you also must not be able to calculate how to get food to your mouth. They're both just electrical signals running around neurons right?
Trolling? Lmao, your word shitting about something completely irrelevant, half the shit I dont bother to read, so why you bother is beyond me....
The discussion was if DLSS and vector graphics are both computer calculations, which they are. That's it..
One looks like shit when fast movement is involved. That's the difference.
Ok?!