this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
414 points (96.4% liked)

News

23627 readers
2479 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Gen Z is increasingly relying on “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) services for holiday shopping, with spending projected to rise 11.4% this year, totaling $18.5 billion.

These services appeal to younger consumers with limited credit histories but can lead to overextension, as they lack centralized reporting and encourage overspending.

Experts warn of accumulating fees, particularly when BNPL plans are tied to credit cards.

With inflation and rising credit card debt already burdening Gen Z, consumer advocates caution that these services may worsen financial instability despite their convenience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 38 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Stuff like this is why the headline Econ stats do not actually reflect reality.

Sure, there's lots of room for critiquing how the media and the investor class focus on stats that are not actually representative of things on the ground for fairly complex mathematical/economic reasons, but that conversation requires people to have a Masters on Econ to understand.

What does not require this is the much simpler: They do not take personal debt levels and credit scores into account.

People say things like 'inflation is going up' 'i cant afford as much as i used to' and ... the main actual reason for this is usually that they're drowning in debt, but are either unaware or don't want to admit it.

This is a country where 54% of adults read and write at below a 6th grade level. Probably a comparable amount can't actually do their own budget.

...

It doesn't matter if your wages go up 2% in a year if you had to spend that year buying groceries on credit to not starve, and those all have 16 to 36% interest rates.

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/personal-finance/buy-now-pay-later-daily-essentials-groceries-young-adults-rcna141718

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Systemic issues can only be solved with systemic changes.

No amount of shaming individuals will fix systemic debt issues, if this is such a large trend that it effects most of the generation then it can only be fixed with systemic changes.

The narrative that individuals are responsible for widespread debt is propaganda meant to shift blame off of the rich people causing wealth inequality to skyrocket

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't think their comment was about shaming individuals, but rather pointing out that there are individual level factors that economists don't take into account when measuring economic health.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Its not even 'individial factors' in the sense that everyone faces unique situations that are not captured by data.

These credit / debt amounts are obviously captured by credit agencies, banks, etc., sold off to data brokers, either anonymized or not.

How else would any credit check occur?

A BLS economist could easily work these in to existing top line numbers, or make a new headline index.

Income Sans Recurring Debt Payments (car, house, consumer debt, student loans, etc)

Average

Median

Percentiles / Buckets / Brackets

Household/Individual

By Age

By Sex

By Location

By Gross Income

By Education Level

....etc.

The data is there. The math is not that hard (for an Economist or Data Scientist).

They just don't.

It's lieing by ommission.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder if this research is done but not picked up by media.

I'm honestly not sure. I have the means to check but not the time-energy, unfortunately.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Maybe a few times a year a story makes it fairly mainstream in terms of internet news, but it almost never trends amongst popular streamers / youtubers / podcasts, or airs on TV.

Credit Karma or some other credit agency, or maybe some non profit or academic research will show up, as this article is...

... But the data obviously exists to be able to study and work into a new metric, which could be reported probably at a monthly pace, worst case, quarterly.

Lies, damned lies, and statistics.

The BLS does, I think? have some very rough aggregate stats on consumer debt levels, but nobody reports on it the way business news orgasms every time the jobs print and CPI come out...

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Systemic issues can only be solved with systemic changes.

Blaming any individual for their outcome in a system that creates these issues distracts people from the cause of the issues, wealth inequality.

That's why choosing to obsess over individual choices is totally useless and literal propaganda keeping people from correctly focusing their frustrations

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No clue how you read myself shaming individuals into what I wrote.

I was writing to explain why everyone feels poorer than all the headline Econ numbers say we should feel.

Why all the libs who spent the last year or two telling us 'the economy is fine actually' were just factually wrong, functionally gaslighting everyone.

If anything, I call out the media, media friendly 'economists' and business people for perpetuating bullshit.

Obviously a general explosion in personal debt levels is a general, systemic problem with systemic solutions?

...

I am all for systemic solutions:

Tax the Wealthy / Tax Corporations

Get rid of student loans, do free tuition

Do a total debt jubilee for those below I dunno 200% poverty income threshold

Cap all consumer credit instruments of all kinds at 3x the Fed Rate

Raise the threshold of income for SNAP and LIHEAP and EITC, etc

Implement universal healthcare, outlaw private insurance, lower costs

Raise the minimum wage

Rent control, automatically expunge all eviction records after 1 or 2 years, actually fund building public housing, write a law that says if a house or condo is on market, unsold, you must drop its price by 5% for every 3 months it remains unsold...

Blah blah, tons of things we could theoretically do.

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Only systemic changes will fix systemic issues.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

... Are you a bot, or do you just have extremely poor reading comprehension?

Can you explain how me stating that a whole bunch of people have a lot of debt ... implies I am blaming them individually for this?

If I told you that black men are much more likely to be sentenced heavily for the same crimes, abused or killed by cops... would you think that means I am implying that that is their fault?

If I told you that trans people have higher suicide rates... am I also implicitly saying that is their fault?

How....are you reading a causal or morally prescriptive blame into these statements that are just data, just statistics... after I have already stated that obviously these are systemic problems that require systemic solutions?

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

If you understand that these systemic issues will only be solved by systemic changes then that's it.

Idk why you keep replying