this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
42 points (95.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40734 readers
336 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I dunno why but I’m worried that casaos is holding me back from doing greater things I guess? I’m pretty new to self hosting and I discovered casaos from a Minecraft server setup tutorial of all things and it’s been great for me so far and does pretty much everything I need it to do, but I feel like I don’t really have a full understanding of what I can do outside of it, and I don’t really hear many people talk about casaos so I’m like worried it’s just not very good I guess? I’m just looking for ways to improve really.

For reference I just use my server for Minecraft on the occasion, a self hosted obsidian live sync, adguard, and in the future plan on hosting nextcloud. Casaos seems great for that and maybe it’s perfectly fine but I’d just be interested in being more knowledgeable I guess, and aware of any ways to improve.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

CasaOS is fine, but the downside of tools like it is you don't really know what's going on under the hood, so if/when something breaks it may be really hard to fix.

But if it works for you I don't see a reason to change. Just make sure you've got reliable backups following the 3-2-1 rule.

[–] bpt11@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What exactly is the 321 rule?

[–] seedd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

3 copies, 2 media, 1 off-site

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's basically the minimum level of redundancy you should have for storing important data.

3 total copies, 2 different types of storage, 1 of them offsite.

Backups also need to be tested like twice a year or so, do a restore as a test (full if you can, but partial is something at least) and make sure the data is what you expect.