this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
892 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19817 readers
56 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, you could just use a vaguely smarter filter. A tiny "L"LM might have different problems, but not this one.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Awww, it's trying its best!

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Indeed; it definitely would show some promise. At that point, you'd run into the problem of needing to continually update its weighting and models to account for evolving language, but that's probably not a completely unsolvable problem.

So maybe "never" is an exaggeration. As currently expressed, though, I think I can probably stand by my assertion.