this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
206 points (97.7% liked)

Gaming

19766 readers
852 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 69 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (12 children)

its not exactly for the positive reason you think. theyre trying to prevent the class action lawsuit going around the (UK?) right now and realized when a certain amount of people take the arbitration, it gets fairly costly, so they reverted on that clause.

regardless fuck arbitration, its like paying off judges but even more transparent about it.

its basically doing the right thing for the wrong reason (reverting arbitration cause not for thr consumer, but for their wallets)

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 35 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (11 children)

Still, the effects benefits the consumer, so I would consider this a good thing.

Also, I wonder if we can do the same to other companies and let them revert course.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (9 children)

Definitely not a Valve W though.

I have no idea how some people can worship a corporation so strongly.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 26 points 23 hours ago

A company that makes some good decisions over a long term stands out in a sea of corps endlessly chasing next quarter

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)