this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
771 points (95.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21607 readers
751 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    771
    submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by renzev@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] wormer@lemmy.ml 47 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I feel like anyone who genuinely has a strong opinion on this and isn't actively developing something related has too much time on their hands ricing their desktop and needs to get a job

    [–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    As someone who's not a developer at all and has been making a comic about systemd for a rather small audience, it's worse than you think: We actually have stuff to do and procrastinate on them while spending time and thoughts in this, reading old blog posts and forum debates as if deciphering Sumerian epic poems. Many pages were made while I was supposed to be preparing for exams, which I barely passed. Others when I should've been cleaning up for moving. I think part of the reason why I haven't made any in a while is that with a faithful audience being born and waiting for the next chapter, it's started feeling like something I had to do, and therefore, the type of stuff I procrastinate on.

    [–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Congratulations on passing your exams! Hang in there. 🙂

    [–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

    Thank you! This year's even harder, but I'm hanging on!

    [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Congrats on passing the exams!

    [–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
    [–] rtxn@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    My full-time job literally involves dealing with systemd's crap. There is a raspberry pi that controls all of our signage. Every time it is powered on, systemd gets stuck because it's trying to mount two separate partitions to the same mount point, whereupon I have to take a keyboard and a ladder, climb up the ceiling, plug in the keyboard, and press Enter to get it to boot. I've tried fixing it, but all I did was break it more.

    [–] Asetru@feddit.org 52 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

    systemd gets stuck because it's trying to mount two separate partitions to the same mount point

    Uh... Sounds like it's not really systemd's fault, your setup is just terrible.

    I've tried fixing it, but all I did was break it more.

    If you're unable to fix it, maybe get somebody else? Like, this doesn't sound like it's an unfixable issue...

    [–] jj4211@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Uh… Sounds like it’s not really system’s fault, your setup is just terrible.

    I don't know his specific issue, but the general behavior of systemd going completely nuts when something is a bit 'off' in some fashion that is supremely confusing. Sure, there's a 'mistake', but good luck figuring out what that mistake is. It's just systemd code tends to be awfully picky in obscure ways.

    Then when someone comes along with a change to tolerate or at least provide a more informative error when some "mistake" has been made is frequently met with "no, there's no sane world where a user should be in that position, so we aren't going to help them out of that" or "that application does not comply with standard X", where X is some standard the application developer would have no reason to know exists, and is just something the systemd guys latched onto.

    See the magical privilege escalation where a user beginning with a number got auto-privileges, and Pottering fought fixing it because "usernames should never begin with a number anyway".

    [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

    I love that mentality to development

    If it has a buffer overflow exploit that caused it to execute arbitrary code is his response that people shouldn't be sending that much data into that port anyway so we're not going to fix it?

    (I feel like this shouldn't require a /s but I'm throwing it in anyway)

    [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Curious, how does changing one of them to a different mount point make things worse?

    [–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'm gonna laugh if it's something as simple as a botched fstab config.

    In the past, it's usually been the case that the more ignorant I am about the computer system, the stronger my opinions are.

    When I first started trying out Linux, I was pissed at it and would regularly rant to anyone who would listen. All because my laptop wouldn't properly sleep: it would turn off, then in a few minutes come back on; turns out the WiFi card had a power setting that was causing it to wake the computer up from sleep.

    After a year of avoiding the laptop, a friend who was visiting from out of town and uses Arch btw took one look at it, diagnosed and fixed it in minutes. I felt like a jackass for blaming the linux world for intel's non-free WiFi driver being shit. (in my defense, I had never needed to toggle this setting when the laptop was originally running Windows).

    The worst part is that I'm a sysadmin, diagnosing and fixing computer problems should be my specialty. Instead I failed to put in the minimum amount of effort and just wrote the entire thing off as a lost cause. Easier then questioning my own infallibility, I suppose.

    [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

    Does indeed sound likely to be an fstab issue, unless system services are being used in a really weird way.

    [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    A typo in fstab shouldn't wreck the system. Why is that not resilient ? I added an extra mount point to an empty partition but forgot to actually create it in LVM.

    During boot, device not found and boot halted, on a computer with no monitor/keyboard

    [–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    It will cause a critical error during boot if the device isn't given the nofail mount option, which is not included in the defaults option, and then fails to mount. For more details, look in the fstab(5) man page, and for even more detail, the mount(8) man page.

    Found that out for myself when not having my external harddrive enclosure turned on with a formatted drive in it caused the pc to boot into recovery mode (it was not the primary drive). I had just copy-pasted the options from my root partition, thinking I could take the shortcut instead of reading documentation.

    There's probably other ways that a borked fstab can cause a fail to boot, but that's just the one I know of from experience.

    [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Cool ! The default should smarter than bork by default.

    [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

    Its a 'failsafe' , like if part of the system depends on that drive mounting then if it fails then don't continue. Not the expected default, but probably made sense at some point. Like if brakes are broken don't allow starting truck, type failsafe.

    [–] wormer@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Yea like the default is smart? How is it supposed to know if that's critical or not at that point? The alternative is for it to silently fail and wait for something else to break instead of failing gracefully? I feel like I'm growing more and more petty and matching the language of systemd haters but like just think about it for a few minutes????

    [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    the default is smart

    Looking at the systems that are supported, it makes the greatest sense to have the safest failure mode as default. If fault tolerance is available, that can be handled in the entry but, it makes sense but to assume. Having that capability built into the default adds more complexity and reduces support for systems that are not tolerant of a missing mount.

    [–] wormer@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

    Sorry if it looked otherwise, I was agreeing to BCsven. I agree with you

    [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

    The system failed for no good reason, failing is exactly what it should never ever do. If it had just continued, everything would have been fine.

    [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Edit: just saw your other comment, so this may not apply to you now....Not that the default is smart, but the default has been set to fail a boot if parts are missing. Imagine a rocket launch system check, is temperature system online, no, fail and abort. While as users -- for convenience--we want the system to boot even though a drive went offline, that may not be best default for induatrial applications. Or where another system relylies on first one to be up and coherent. So we have to use the nofail option, to contine the boot on missing drive.

    [–] jdeath@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

    can you get something besides a pi?

    [–] ysjet@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    As someone who has strong opinions on this, and not only has a job but has a job related to exactly sort of thing.... We use freebsd.

    Specifically to avoid shit like systemd, and other questionable choices forced down people's throats by idiots who can't stop touching things that work well because they didn't invent it.

    [–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    What do you use freebsd for? Server or clients and what kind of workload?

    [–] ysjet@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

    Servers, and workloads are various- DNS, ntp, databases, a few websites, internal servers running code/apis/etc for internal processes, etc.