Programming

17668 readers

170 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

How do you view your role in public ethics as a developer? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by j4k3@lemmy.world to c/programming@programming.dev

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I figured out how to remove most of the safeguards from some AI models. I don't feel comfortable sharing that information with anyone. I have come across a few layers of obfuscation to make this type of alteration more difficult to find and sort out. This caused me to realize, a lot of you are likely faced with similar dilemmas of responsibility, gatekeeping, and manipulating others for ethical reasons. How do you feel about this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"What am I supposed to call LLMs if not calling them AIs?"

...really dude? They're large language models, not artificial intelligences. So that's what you call them. Because that's what they are.

The fact that they came from research into artificial intelligence doesn't factor in. Microwave ovens came from radar research, doesn't mean we call them radars, does it?

[–] KRAW@linux.community 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

OK what qualifies as AI then?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nothing we currently have

[–] KRAW@linux.community 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So the entire field of AI has produced no AI. Gotcha 👌

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. That's research. Sometimes you don't achieve what you set out to do.

[–] KRAW@linux.community 1 points 3 months ago

Well luckily AI researchers have achieved plenty in over 60 years. We call the ideas and innovations resulting from this research "AI."

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

How about something autonomous that makes choices of its own will, and performs long term learning that influences the choices it makes, just as a flat benchmark.

LLMs don't qualify, they're trained, retain information within a conversation, then forget it after the conversation is closed. They don't do any long term learning after their initial training so they're basically forever trapped in the mode of regurgitating within the parameters set by the training data at the time they're trained.

That's just a very fancy way to search and read out the training data. Definitely not an active intelligence in there.

They also don't have any autonomy, they're not active of their own accord when they're not being addressed. They're not sitting there thinking, so they have no internal personal landscape of thought. They have no place in which a private intelligence can be at play.

They're innert.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

They are 100% ai. They run on neural networks which were some of the first AIs.