this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43803 readers
798 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] what_is_a_name@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] danieljackson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It depends to what you mean by "rich people." Yes, climate shambled by the global north, or the to 20% richest citizens of the planet.

I agree that big corporations bear a big burden for climate change, like, for example, Exxon which knew about CO~2~ since the 50s, and tried to hide it, and lobby against any regulation.

But saying that, us the 99% westerners don't bare responsability by buying a new iPhone every year, is a lie.

[–] PostmodernPythia@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Given that the corporations own the politicians who make the laws that structure our lives and allow planned obsolescence and a lack of transparency in things like phones, still going to put 90% of the blame on the rich here. Your perspective might be correct in a functional democracy, but that’s not where most people (nor even most Westerners) live.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Pollution occurs at the point of extraction, production and logistics, not at the point of consumption.