this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
933 points (98.3% liked)

News

23627 readers
2449 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Have we not known this for years?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've always used it as an example of when oversimplified chalkboard economics don't match experimental reality.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are the “oversimplified chalkboard economics” basically the businesses winging about having to pay people more?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

What follows is incorrect

It's a price floor, which creates a deadweight loss.

Since we're also consumers, it's a net loss.

Tbf, economics has to presume inequality to be non existent. If they dont, inequality is the overriding factor that makes all the other forces at play pale in comparison. So, they remove inequality.

Again, tbf, in a world with no inequality, where only the very best and brightest rise to the top and not just a endless stream of nepo babies, with whole institutions in place to ensure a lack of social mobility, a national minimum wage would be a bad idea. Just like tax breaks for the rich would fix any problem you had, in that fake - made up world that could never exist.

But, as you allude to, in the real world, things are very different.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Should it not just be integrated in to the supply cost?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but how exactly that distorts the market is counterintuitive.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Intuitive chalkboard economics lead to the net loss conclusion above. Experimental reality as described in the study says otherwise.

[–] PrivacyDingus@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Card & Kreuger has been held up by right wingers for ages as evidence to the contrary but it's a very bad study