this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
916 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

58013 readers
2839 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
916
Texas judge who bought Tesla stock won’t recuse himself from X v. Media Matters (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
112 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Does the American law still not have an auto-recuse system that does not even put you on a case of a company you own stock of?

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It does not. You need to ask a judge to recuse themselves and if that doesn’t work ask the court above them to reassign. If they even take it up. Usually the biased judge hears the case then it gets appealed. Which wastes a lot of time and a lot of money.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which wastes a lot of time and a lot of money.

The American way.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The Texas way. This lawsuit is pure SLAPP. Texas does not have an anti-SLAPP law, and Musk went judge shopping for this specific asshole.

load more comments (3 replies)