this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2234 readers
71 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The discounts, agreed to after months of negotiations with drug manufacturers, range between 38% and 79% on the medication’s list price, which is the cost of medication before discounts or rebates are applied — not the price people actually pay for prescriptions.

Medicare spent $50 billion covering the drugs last year and taxpayers are expected to save $6 billion on the new prices, which do not go into effect until 2026. Older adults could save as much as $1.5 billion in total on their medications in out-of-pocket costs. Administration officials released few details about how they arrived at those calculations.

The newly negotiated prices will impact the price of drugs used by millions of older Americans to help manage diabetes, blood cancers and prevent heart failure or blood clots. The drugs include the blood thinners Xarelto and Eliquis and diabetes drugs Jardiance and Januvia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 16 points 1 month ago (8 children)

It’s expected Medicare drug price negotiations will save the government $98.5 billion over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office, which scored the Inflation Reduction Act. - Source

Absolutely insane.

Imagine if we had Medicare for all (and the leverage that came with).

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine a system more concerned about healthcare and not itemization of billable services.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

Like if the government had a financial stake in your health, instead of a companies financial incentive to make sure you don't receive care?

load more comments (6 replies)