this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
210 points (83.0% liked)

Technology

57997 readers
2812 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Intel breathes a sigh of relief as the spotlight moves off of them for a beat.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (12 children)

It does mean that any secondhand computer or CPU (or even CPU from a sketchy source) could be compromised prior to being physically sold.

It's worse than that, any AMD chip from any source except maybe AMD directly is suspect. Mine is a few years old from Amazon supposedly new, for all I know it came compromised and is sitting there doing what I tell it to until it triggers and I won't even know when or if it happens.

[–] rhombus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If I understand it correctly, the chip has the vulnerability, but the malware would be installed on the motherboard in the form of a bootkit. So getting a used CPU is not a threat, but getting a used motherboard is (and kind of always has been) a risk.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It allows for adulteration of firmware, the CPU has firmware. 🤷

[–] rhombus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

CPU firmware exploits are incredibly rare, if there even are any that exist beyond proof-of-concept. The chances of getting an infected CPU from this is so unlikely it’s practically impossible.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You forget that the CPU has a nanny CPU built in these days.

[–] rhombus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

Which, again, is an incredibly unlikely attack vector unless you have some government secrets on your computer. And chances are that any attack through the IME or PSP is trying to do an implant into the UEFI/BIOS and not the processor itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)