this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
498 points (97.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53939 readers
322 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.intai.tech/post/43759

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/949452

OpenAI's ChatGPT and Sam Altman are in massive trouble. OpenAI is getting sued in the US for illegally using content from the internet to train their LLM or large language models

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RatzChatsubo@vlemmy.net 96 points 1 year ago (37 children)

So we can sue robots but when I ask if we can tax them, and reduce human working hours, I'm the crazy one?

[–] slipperydippery@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

What would you tax exactly? Robots don't earn an income and don't inherently make a profit. You could tax a company or owner who profits off of robots and/or sells their labor.

[–] RatzChatsubo@vlemmy.net 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It would have to be some sort of moderated labor cost saving tax kind of thing enforced by the government

[–] devzero@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Should we tax bulldozers because they take away jobs from people using shovels? What about farm equipment, since they take away jobs from people picking fruit by hand? What about mining equipment, because they take away jobs from people using pickaxes?

[–] PlebsicleMcGee@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

And we're just gonna let the pickaxes off without a tax?

[–] RatzChatsubo@vlemmy.net -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If the machine replaced the human, yes. That's the argument being made currently.

Imagine if we simply taxed machine profits after 40 hours of work. You not only can give kickbacks to large companies, but you could also rewire profits to UBI

[–] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the wrong way to go about it, though. Just tax businesses' profits and close the bullshit loopholes they exploit to avoid paying them.

[–] devzero@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But 40 hours of "work" is poorly defined. If you had everyone digging with spoons on your construction site, then you might need 100 people at 40 hours per week. If you have everyone shovels, you would only need 10 people at 40 hours a week. Do you want to tax shovels for "taking the job" from 90 people?

[–] RatzChatsubo@vlemmy.net 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah idk, I'm no expert. I just want wealth redistribution

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)