this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
276 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 129 points 4 months ago (21 children)

Is this a question?

We haven't even come close to exhausting 64-bit addresses yet. If you think the bit number makes things faster, it's technically the opposite.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 35 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, 64 bit handles almost all use cases we have. Sometimes we want double the precision (a double) or length (a long), but we can do that without being 128-bit. It's harder to do half. Sure, it'd be slightly faster for some things, but it's not significant.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 9 points 4 months ago

There's plenty of instructions for processing integers and fp numbers from 8 bits to 512 bits with a single instruction and register. There's been a lot of work in packed math instructions for neural network inference.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)