this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

homeassistant

11372 readers
23 users here now

Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts. Perfect to run on a Raspberry Pi or a local server. Available for free at home-assistant.io

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't have yet any preferences. Cheap, easy to set up, secure. What do you use and can recommend?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maxgyver@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Reolink. Cheap, good enough quality, great HA integration, no internet connection needed.

[–] Tinkerer@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

+1 they are completely local, cheap and have a tight integration with home assistant, I have 5 of their cameras.

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

can these be configured to stream TO a remote frigate server?

Example: I'd like to install one at my parent's house, connect it to my parent's wifi, but have it stream to frigate, that's hosted on my server in another city?

[–] maxgyver@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i had frigate running locally and could integrate them. That said i grabbed the stream from the local network. I guess you would need some sort of local pi to forward the streams. But that is well above my pay grade ^^ sorry

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I've already heard about such a solution, where I'd need a Pi that acts as the streaming client, which then should work with any camera.

[–] maxgyver@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

apparently it’s possible without a relay look here

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It might not be original quality, but this should be fairly straightforward with a tunnel or VPN connection to your parent's house. You'd also lose quality in having a WiFi camera instead of wired.

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Reolink cameras are twice the price of the Tapo ones in my area....

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've never used either, so I can't speak to their actual quality, but cheaping out on cameras defeats the purpose of getting cameras if the footage is too grainy or blurry to be used for anything.

[–] Stampela@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

The wireless Reolinks are not great. Like, nothing against the camera itself, however, the WiFi antenna must be smaller than the one in my watch. The range is truly abysmal.

Tapo ones are perfectly fine, good quality all around, but it’s important to specify that I have experience with external, solar powered Reolinks and indoor Tapo, so it’s a bit of a different category.

[–] Mpeach45@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And probably four times the quality. If I could go back in time and choose Reolink for every camera I have, I would. In a heartbeat.

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 1 points 11 months ago

I'm pretty happy with the 2K footage on mine.