this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
836 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32410 readers
292 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 74 points 5 months ago (7 children)

And when the opensource maintainer changes the license to adapt to the economic situation, the OSIsts rush in to tell the maintainer how evil they are.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What does that license have to do with AI?

[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

~~It's an explicit "opt-out" by the OP, such that their content cannot (legally) be used to train LLMs or such (Chat GPT, Github Copilot, etc)~~

Well, that's what I assumed until i read the license terms. It doesn't explicitly mention AI or LLMs, but it does say

You may not use the material for commercial purposes

Which i assume has the same limitations for AI training, for commercial AI

(I am not a lawyer)

[–] barinzaya@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Also not a lawyer, but my understanding has always been that a license grants permissions, not limits them. No license means no permissions granted. Most sites have terms that you agree to (by posting to the site) that tell you what they may do with your content, and I don't think a license you tack onto it can change that (though it can grant permission to others).

As for scrapers and such, they were never granted any permissions to use anything. They just don't care. A license is also unlikely to change that.

I think licenses on posts are pointless and tacky, personally, but I could be missing something.

load more comments (4 replies)