this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
331 points (98.8% liked)

World News

32063 readers
1047 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What's extra insane about the google one, Pichai's salary of 225m divided over the 10k workers fired is a staggering 22.5k/yr. If you assume the average tech salary of a remote google employee is somewhere in the 50k-100k range, that's 2.5k-5k / 10k workers that could have been saved by cutting Pichai instead.

Forget societal ethics, how do you justify to shareholders cutting ten thousand salaries worth of jobs and giving half the money to the CEO?

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Isn't Pichai's compensation mostly tied to stock?

It's... Not really the same thing, because being the CEO of the company ties the hands behind his back if he wants to actually use his stock compensation.

Edit: for any Google SWE making <100k, just move to the US, man. The pay is so much higher it's not even funny.

[–] pedro@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Comparing pay from one country to another is a lot harder than just looking at the numbers. Earning 100k$ in the US is not the same as earning 100k$ in Poland for example

[–] zoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This. It's like day and night. 100k in SF isn't much at all

load more comments (3 replies)