this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
641 points (95.9% liked)

World News

32159 readers
681 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yor@hexbear.net 50 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (18 children)

Without the support of Congress, it will be "difficult" for Ukraine to win, "even to stay," Zelenskyy said in a video meeting with fundraising supporters, including Mark Hamill and billionaire Richard Branson.

Nightmare blunt rotation

Anyway, wow! You mean every time Russia was said to be slowing down or taking unsustainable levels of casualties wasn't entirely true? Wow! surprised-pika

[–] 420stalin69@hexbear.net 25 points 5 months ago (10 children)

I think the weakness of Ukraine is also narrative.

Whatever narrative they push, it’s completely unrelated to the truth.

When they wanted western sympathy and when the western funds were rolling, it was the plucky tractor brigade killing Russians at $1.40 a kill.

Now that they aren’t getting another aid package, the front lines are about to collapse and Russia will be in Warsaw by summer.

It’s all bullshit. As in it’s unrelated to the truth. The truth has no relationship to what Zelenskyy says.

The fact Ukraine is starting to push an imminent collapse narrative is a key factor in me believing collapse is not in fact imminent.

[–] dragonfly4933@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago (9 children)

You are right, you can't use only information Ukraine or Russia provides. But it probably is the case that Ukraine was stomping Russia for pennies on the dollar earlier in the war. However, Russia is not a static force. They learn and change their tactics, and Russia spends more resources now than they did earlier.

It would be a grave mistake to stop aid to Ukraine while they are still willing and able to fight.

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The West has spent many times Russias military budget and hundreds of thousands of soldiers only to lose the war.

Russia will likely gain several states worth of land.

Unsure how this is a “good deal”, even in the most psychopathic framing possible. I’d think that would mean Russia is getting the good deal in that case? They have spent far less and gained actual winnings.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

"The west has spent many times Russia's military budget" Source?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)