this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
60 points (71.1% liked)

World News

32045 readers
736 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 2 points 6 months ago (19 children)

A site or source has to earn the credit before it can be discredited.

You can attack the one making the critique all you want and it doesn’t establish actual credibility for the original source. The grayzone’s weaknesses in misleading coverage and sympathetic coverage of authoritarian regimes is well noted in academic journals and other sources cited the references on their Wikipedia page.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (15 children)
[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

That would be literally devastating if I had cited Wikipedia itself instead of using it as a way to point you to a long list of citations from far more authoritative sources without wasting my time typing them all out again.

Good effort though.

[–] AmidFuror@kbin.chat 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Actually, it still wouldn't have been devastating because it continues to ignore the credibility of The Grayzone as the subject matter of the comment thread. It's just doubling down on the original tangent.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)