this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
189 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

58403 readers
3726 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

That's still only 0.034% of its market cap, it would simply be a slap on the wrist even if they lose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 23 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Not to mention, It isn't a given that they win.

I ANAL 😏 but in order to claim their fees are excessive, I'd expect that the plaintiffs would need to show that they are substantially higher than fees in other circumstances. I don't think 15-20% is unusual for other software stores, including the google play store which has a number of competitors on android, or steam on PC which also has a number of competitors on PC.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Not a lawyer, but I suspect where Apple could land in hot water is apparently 85% of iPhone App developers are only paying $100 per year. They don't pay any commission to Apple at all, because the apps collect revenue via some other source.

So Apple is essentially singling out 15% of developers and forcing them to pay a extraordinarily more than what most of their competitors are paying.

I expect it will also hurt Apple's case they are directly competing with millions of developers. You want to sell a note taking app for example? You're competing directly with Apple. And Apple has various unfair advantages.

[–] Vamanos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So Apple is essentially singling out 15% of developers and forcing them to pay a extraordinarily more than what most of their competitors are paying.

But that’s not true. And your response to this in the other comment chain was three paragraphs on sms rates. Seems like you believe somehow Apple is unique in this regard.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What's not true? It is absolutely true that the majority of apps on the App Store don't pay (or at least pay very little). And it's true that the ones that do pay are paying billions of dollars.

Antitrust law is all about ensuring competitors are on equal footing with each other. Apple's walled garden makes equal footing impossible. Is it illegal? I don't know. But I think it should be and I hope the laws are adjusted if necessary to make it illegal.

Fair competition is critical for a functioning economy. It's fundamentally unfair that a select few app developers are forced to collectively pay billions of dollars in fees that nobody else has to pay.

[–] Vamanos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Holy fuck another 3 paragraph essay. Maybe the part I fucking quoted

Trying again

forcing them to pay a extraordinarily more than what most of their competitors are paying.

You literally ignore every counterpoint and then inundate your responses with content that doesn’t apply. Try again.

More words != compelling argument or facts

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)