this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
90 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3517 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
90
Apple to stop selling its latest smartwatches after losing patent case to rival that says 'even the world’s most powerful company must abide by the law' (fortune.com)
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Apple to stop selling its latest smartwatches after losing patent case to rival that says 'even the world’s most powerful company must abide by the law'::Sales of the Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 will be halted on the company’s online store on Dec. 21 and at its physical retail locations beginning on Christmas Eve.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I wasn't aware that they actually LOST the case, just that it was "disputed". Wow.

Pulse oximeters retail for about $20, they couldn't just settle? Offer them back $10 to $15 per watch sold?

[–] BigBlackBuck@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I believe the company didn’t want to license or settle because they are producing their own smart watch, but I don’t remember where I read that.

[–] lobsticle@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I wonder if they're a publicly traded company. Given the choice between this company trying to compete in the marketplace against Apple versus a guaranteed revenue stream from licensing and royalty fees (and likely a lucrative one at that), I'm pretty sure I know which the shareholders would pick. If this company ends up doing the former and going under, I can just smell the shareholder lawsuit that would ensue.

[–] BigBlackBuck@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 months ago

They are public, NASDAQ: MASI

Stock price $116.75, YTD down 20.05%