this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
40 points (93.5% liked)

Games

16430 readers
951 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Alright I’ll take the hit I really don’t care about the speeches. Having AAA studios come up and thank their devs that they made work 60 hours of crunch time a week is lame. I don’t need to see Todd Howard accept another award and talk about being in the chess club.

[–] Pietson@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's fair enough, but it's still an awards show, surely those should be the important bit? If wants to be the next E3 it shouldn't do that half-assed and either split it off into a separate show, or drop the awards so a better show can get the focus.

[–] Fraylor@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If they want it to be important let the Fuckers who made the game talk. Not the fucking talking heads of whatever company rushed and crunched them.

[–] Pietson@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

I do agree with that.

load more comments (3 replies)