this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
142 points (96.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

3 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (19 children)

I thought solidarity strikes are illegal. What are they planning?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 23 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Making any strike illegal is so weird to me, like it goes against the idea of a strike in my mind. Isn't the entire point that they don't want you to do it, it's the power a group of people have over the tiny elite?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I can see how it can be potentially problematic. For example, If I’m the owner of a shipping company what leverage do I have over Hollywood execs to pay writers and actors better?

[–] Raconteur_Rob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Those Hollywood execs work for giant conglomerates that own a whole host of media properties including television stations. If the CEO of UPS, one of the largest, if not THE largest, shipping companies in the world, called up Viacom, for example, and said that UPS is going to pull advertising from all Viacom owned entities if they don't give into SAG-AFTRA and WGA demands, that would do enough damage to potentially end the strike. It would cost Viacom millions of dollars on top of what they're already going to lose from the strike.

But UPS isn't going to do that because if striking works for anybody, they might have to pay their workers more.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That makes sense. (!/!&:

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That makes sense. (!/!&:

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That makes sense. (!/!&:

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That makes sense. (!/!&:

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)