this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
166 points (81.0% liked)

Canada

7311 readers
402 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wealth is not money, can't buy bread with a staircase.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes and no. Wealth can be used as a proxy, usually via debt, to acquire more wealth. If this wasn't the case, Elon Musk would not have been able to buy Twitter.

This is why renters are absolutely screwed: not only are they spending the same as someone with a mortgage in many cases, but they can't leverage equity at all. Need a car repair done? Send a kid to school? Retire? Invest? If you rent, you're screwed.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're not talking about Musk here. Most home owners can't leverage their equity to buy some bread.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, they can.

Many (many!) have leveraged their equity into buying more houses to rent out for income, and/or into all sorts of HELOC-related silliness.

I don't think peolle realize how stark the divide is between people with homes and people without, especially for anyone who bought before 2020. We've created, almost overnight, a massive and likely permanent underclass, and we have no intention of putting the kinds of supports in place to deal with the problems that will create over the next few decades as renters are broken by retirement and AI.

We've substituted paying fair wages and having real retirement plans with house value, and now we're on the verge of slamming the door on a huge portion of our society by locking them out of home equity at the same time we're diluting their earnings.

Yes, Musk et al are an extreme example, but the equity gap is real.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Do you even read?

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can't buy bread with stocks either but Elon is still rich.

The difference is that you can't earn a living by owning your primary residence, so you're still working class.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's my point. Owning a home doesn't make anyone rich. Owning multiple homes which generate income is a different thing, but people here assume is that if you bough a house in London 20 years ago for pennies, then today you are a fucking Bezos swimming in money. That's not the case.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Maybe you can't, I bought a bar. It came with an owners suite.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah you can, you can leverage your equity to buy basically anything. Another house for instance...

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you leverage your equity to buy bread, you'll be homeless very soon.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not if your equity is always increasing

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't increase out of thin air.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You're confusing house price with equity.

Sort of. You can do a one-time conversion to income if you want, and income can of course be diverted towards very slowly building up wealth, but yeah they're not the same thing.